<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX static NAT in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-static-nat/m-p/600658#M499863</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You stated you have&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Server A (ip=10.0.0.1) located at 'dmz1' LOWER SECURITY&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Server B (ip=192.168.0.1) located at 'dmz2' HIGHER SECURITY&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (dmz2,dmz1) 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;will allow B to access A (You are natting dmz2 source 192.168.0.1 to source 192.168.0.1 when it exits dmz1 interface)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if you also want to to allow A to access B (that is A originates traffic)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;you'll need to also include acl entry and apply to dmz1 interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (dmz1,dmz2) 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;this is destination nat which translate packets destined to 10.0.0.1 on dmz2 to 10.0.0.1 on dmz1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These two statements are very different.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 04:32:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>hemendoz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-06-30T04:32:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX static NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-static-nat/m-p/600655#M499860</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hello!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Server A (ip=10.0.0.1) located at 'dmz1' and server B (ip=192.168.0.1) located at 'dmz2' shold communicate to each other.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;which of the following commands completes the task?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. static (dmz1,dmz2) 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. static (dmz2,dmz1) 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 09:00:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-static-nat/m-p/600655#M499860</guid>
      <dc:creator>tcherkon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T09:00:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX static NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-static-nat/m-p/600656#M499861</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can't tell - what are the security levels?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Remember the basic pix rules:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;low security -&amp;gt; higher = static NAT (and ACL).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;high -&amp;gt; low = "nat" &amp;amp; "global".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;to avoid NAting static NAT goes:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (high,low) real_IP real_IP .....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it's a bit diffrent if they are the same security level.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 11:49:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-static-nat/m-p/600656#M499861</guid>
      <dc:creator>grant.maynard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-06-29T11:49:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX static NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-static-nat/m-p/600657#M499862</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Grant!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Security levels:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;dmz1 = 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;dmz2 = 20&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've checked out the following. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. When I type:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (dmz2,dmz1) 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;B is able to establish connection to A&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. When I type&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (dmz1,dmz2) 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;B is not able to establish connection to A. Why?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 02:17:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-static-nat/m-p/600657#M499862</guid>
      <dc:creator>tcherkon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-06-30T02:17:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX static NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-static-nat/m-p/600658#M499863</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You stated you have&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Server A (ip=10.0.0.1) located at 'dmz1' LOWER SECURITY&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Server B (ip=192.168.0.1) located at 'dmz2' HIGHER SECURITY&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (dmz2,dmz1) 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;will allow B to access A (You are natting dmz2 source 192.168.0.1 to source 192.168.0.1 when it exits dmz1 interface)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if you also want to to allow A to access B (that is A originates traffic)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;you'll need to also include acl entry and apply to dmz1 interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (dmz1,dmz2) 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;this is destination nat which translate packets destined to 10.0.0.1 on dmz2 to 10.0.0.1 on dmz1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These two statements are very different.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 04:32:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-static-nat/m-p/600658#M499863</guid>
      <dc:creator>hemendoz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-06-30T04:32:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

