<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX fail over and HSRP integration  in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-fail-over-and-hsrp-integration/m-p/541769#M501118</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you are usging BGP and are multihomed with a primary and a backup link, dont use HSRP. Peer with the two isp with eBGP and peer your edge router with iBGP. Between the edge router and the pix, run ospf. The two edge router should send only a default route to the pix. Use a route-map on the 2 router to get them to only sent default if they have the best outside route. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;default-information originate metric 5 route-map SEND_DEFAULT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route-map SEND_DEFAULT permit 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; match ip address 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; match ip next-hop 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 1 permit 0.0.0.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 2 permit #.#.#.# (ISP 1)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 2 permit #.#.#.# (ISP 2)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the pix(s), advertise your network with a network-summary statement. Impact on the cpu of the pix will be very small, ospf routing table will have only one entry.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You will have full redendancy this way. In case you have a routing protocol problem, might be a good idea to put a few floating static route...just in case&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 21:38:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dominic.caron</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-05-25T21:38:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX fail over and HSRP integration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-fail-over-and-hsrp-integration/m-p/541767#M501116</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is regarding PIX failover  and HSRP put together to have 100 % redundancy. Device connectivity is like this . Two  routers having serial links to separate  ISP&amp;#146;s ( R1 and R2 ). . Ethernet ports of these routers  connected to two  separate switches.( outside-sw1 and outside-sw2 )  Two PIX firewalls  connected in state-full  failover mode. , outside interface ( pix1-outside  and  Pix2-outside ) of these PIX will be connected to the previously mentioned switches(outside-sw1 and outside-sw2 ) .   Similarly Inside interfaces ( pix1-inside and pix2-inside ) of these PIX will be connected to two separate switches. ( inside-sw1 and inside-sw2). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In a nutshell  ,   R1- eth0  outside-sw1 ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                          PIX1-outside  outside sw1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And   &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                          R2-eth0 - outside-sw2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                          PIX2 -outside   outside-sw2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And                    PIX1-inside  inside-sw1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                           PIX-inside  inside-sw2 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; PIX1 to  PIX2  failover cable and lan cable &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; inside-sw1 to   inside-sw2   cross cable  / trunk&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;outside-sw1 to   outside-sw2   cross cable  / trunk &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So it  is   a chain of devices running in parallel giving  redundancy upto each device level.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to configure HSRP with these  routers , switches and failover with PIX.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any link about integration of these devices will be appreciated &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;please see following slide in attachments &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:55:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-fail-over-and-hsrp-integration/m-p/541767#M501116</guid>
      <dc:creator>bapatsubodh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T08:55:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX fail over and HSRP integration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-fail-over-and-hsrp-integration/m-p/541768#M501117</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you use BGP to peer with your two ISPs. My Internet Edge is designed in a similar way and I tested all possible failure scenario when I designed it. Be glad to help if it match.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 16:23:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-fail-over-and-hsrp-integration/m-p/541768#M501117</guid>
      <dc:creator>dominic.caron</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-05-25T16:23:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX fail over and HSRP integration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-fail-over-and-hsrp-integration/m-p/541769#M501118</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you are usging BGP and are multihomed with a primary and a backup link, dont use HSRP. Peer with the two isp with eBGP and peer your edge router with iBGP. Between the edge router and the pix, run ospf. The two edge router should send only a default route to the pix. Use a route-map on the 2 router to get them to only sent default if they have the best outside route. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;default-information originate metric 5 route-map SEND_DEFAULT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route-map SEND_DEFAULT permit 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; match ip address 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; match ip next-hop 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 1 permit 0.0.0.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 2 permit #.#.#.# (ISP 1)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 2 permit #.#.#.# (ISP 2)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the pix(s), advertise your network with a network-summary statement. Impact on the cpu of the pix will be very small, ospf routing table will have only one entry.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You will have full redendancy this way. In case you have a routing protocol problem, might be a good idea to put a few floating static route...just in case&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 21:38:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-fail-over-and-hsrp-integration/m-p/541769#M501118</guid>
      <dc:creator>dominic.caron</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-05-25T21:38:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX fail over and HSRP integration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-fail-over-and-hsrp-integration/m-p/541770#M501119</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are in the process of bringing up a secondary router and internet connection (same ISP).  I do plan on running BGP between these routers and eBGP between their neighbors.  I currently have one PIX 515 (6.3) using static routes.  Could you post or email me privately the OSPF configuration?  Do you run OSPF between your PIX and inside network?  Or only run OSPF between the PIX and internet routers?  I am unsure of how to provide a different default gateways on the PIX.  Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 20:57:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-fail-over-and-hsrp-integration/m-p/541770#M501119</guid>
      <dc:creator>r-tyrell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-27T20:57:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

