<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Pix interface error in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-interface-error/m-p/1637571#M502664</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;"no buffer" error typically means that the PIX interface is overloaded: &lt;SPAN class="content"&gt;The number of received packets discarded because there was no buffer space in the main system, and same goes for "overruns": &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="content"&gt;The number of times that the security appliance&amp;nbsp; was incapable of handing received data to a hardware buffer because the&amp;nbsp; input rate exceeded the security appliance capability to handle the&amp;nbsp; data. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which PIX did you have and what version of PIX are you running? You might look into getting an ASA with bigger capacity that can handle more connections.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the ASA models if you are interested:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/prod_models_comparison.html#~mid-range"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/prod_models_comparison.html#~mid-range&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that answers your question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 01:09:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-01-10T01:09:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Pix interface error</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-interface-error/m-p/1637570#M502663</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm having no buffer and overuns errors&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in 2 giga interfaces&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;568612690628 packets input, 356568347548892 bytes, 104287727 no buffer&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Received 1032492130 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 33255019 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 18839623 L2 decode drops&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 528455832810 packets output, 227047857599309 bytes, 2 underruns&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0 output errors, 0 collisions&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0 late collisions, 0 deferred&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; input queue (curr/max blocks): hardware (0/0) software (0/0)&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; output queue (curr/max blocks): hardware (0/255) software (0/0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;323731736185 packets input, 112257102515517 bytes, 61709167 no buffer&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Received 1742151 broadcasts, 97 runts, 27 giants&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 29709592 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 26 L2 decode drops&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 363619684293 packets output, 258692320547522 bytes, 0 underruns&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0 output errors, 0 collisions&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0 late collisions, 0 deferred&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; input queue (curr/max blocks): hardware (0/0) software (0/0)&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; output queue (curr/max blocks): hardware (0/143) software (0/0)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I cheched the speed from both sides and that's the same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the switch, this error doesn't occur.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Someone can help me to solve this issue?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:12:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-interface-error/m-p/1637570#M502663</guid>
      <dc:creator>suportedgx</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T12:12:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pix interface error</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-interface-error/m-p/1637571#M502664</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;"no buffer" error typically means that the PIX interface is overloaded: &lt;SPAN class="content"&gt;The number of received packets discarded because there was no buffer space in the main system, and same goes for "overruns": &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="content"&gt;The number of times that the security appliance&amp;nbsp; was incapable of handing received data to a hardware buffer because the&amp;nbsp; input rate exceeded the security appliance capability to handle the&amp;nbsp; data. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which PIX did you have and what version of PIX are you running? You might look into getting an ASA with bigger capacity that can handle more connections.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the ASA models if you are interested:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/prod_models_comparison.html#~mid-range"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/prod_models_comparison.html#~mid-range&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that answers your question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 01:09:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-interface-error/m-p/1637571#M502664</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-10T01:09:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

