<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PIX failover requirement in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-requirement/m-p/543911#M525665</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello- &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hv PIX 515E with 16MB flash,64MB RAM &amp;amp; VAC for which I am building failover.The failover bundle has come in with PIX515E-FO with 16MB flash,128MB RAM &amp;amp; VAC+.I understand both primary &amp;amp; secondary has to hv identical config for the failover to work &amp;amp; hence downgraded the FO pix from 128MB RAM to 64 MB RAM,but not sure if VAC+ also needs to be downgraded in PIX-FO so that both primary &amp;amp; secondary has VAC.Can u folks confirm if having VAC in primary &amp;amp; VAC+ in secondary PIX will work.. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SS &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:50:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sikkander</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T08:50:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX failover requirement</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-requirement/m-p/543911#M525665</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello- &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hv PIX 515E with 16MB flash,64MB RAM &amp;amp; VAC for which I am building failover.The failover bundle has come in with PIX515E-FO with 16MB flash,128MB RAM &amp;amp; VAC+.I understand both primary &amp;amp; secondary has to hv identical config for the failover to work &amp;amp; hence downgraded the FO pix from 128MB RAM to 64 MB RAM,but not sure if VAC+ also needs to be downgraded in PIX-FO so that both primary &amp;amp; secondary has VAC.Can u folks confirm if having VAC in primary &amp;amp; VAC+ in secondary PIX will work.. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SS &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:50:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-requirement/m-p/543911#M525665</guid>
      <dc:creator>sikkander</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T08:50:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX failover requirement</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-requirement/m-p/543912#M525666</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't think VAC+ needs to be downgraded in PIX-FO &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:52:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-requirement/m-p/543912#M525666</guid>
      <dc:creator>mchin345</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-04-17T14:52:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

