<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Load balancing across two Pixes 525 in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balancing-across-two-pixes-525/m-p/604255#M526612</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Remember that active/active supports asymetrical load balancing&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 12:55:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jcockburn</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-03-24T12:55:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Load balancing across two Pixes 525</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balancing-across-two-pixes-525/m-p/604249#M526596</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm creating network solution that will have two Pix 525 firewalls connected to two different ISPs. For performance reasons i would like that my clients connect to Internet through both firewalls in round robin fashion. What are my possibilities?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to create something like Gateway load balancing protocol (GLBP) on 2800 series of router. I don't know and can't find out if Pix supports GLBP. If not, are any similiar solution supported?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for any answer.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:46:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balancing-across-two-pixes-525/m-p/604249#M526596</guid>
      <dc:creator>miloskv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T08:46:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load balancing across two Pixes 525</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balancing-across-two-pixes-525/m-p/604250#M526599</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PIX doesnt support GLBP. the solution for your requirement is :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) Run both the PIX boxes in load-balancing mode. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Terminate both the ISPs on 2800 router  and it will be the front end.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) connect both the PIX box`s outside interface to 2800 LAN ports.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4) On 2800, configure the PBR along with NAT for 2 ISPs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A route map allows the user to match any combination of ACLs, next-hop IP addresses, and output interfaces to determine which NAT pool to use.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kindly update me for further clarification.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aashish C&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 10:50:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balancing-across-two-pixes-525/m-p/604250#M526599</guid>
      <dc:creator>aashish.c</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-13T10:50:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load balancing across two Pixes 525</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balancing-across-two-pixes-525/m-p/604251#M526603</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ok, thanks for the suggestion. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One more question... &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what do You think to terminate two ISPs onto two 2800 ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can start GLBP on routers. Will my PIX support load balancing now? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've never worked with pix load balancing. Do You have any pdf or site on which i can explore more?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(please not only cisco.com, 'couse it is very heavy to find exactly what you want :))&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for any comments&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Milos&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 10:59:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balancing-across-two-pixes-525/m-p/604251#M526603</guid>
      <dc:creator>miloskv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-13T10:59:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load balancing across two Pixes 525</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balancing-across-two-pixes-525/m-p/604252#M526606</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Milos,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have another solution for you for 2 ISP requirement, that is OER (Optimized Edge Routing). Here is the link which will show you the multiple scenarios and its functionality.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6599/products_data_sheet0900aecd801dfcec.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6599/products_data_sheet0900aecd801dfcec.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you find it good then you may run your firewalls in failover mode, behind the OER master router for security purposes, but not for any routing purpose.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2nd solution could be PBR with the Multiple Tracking Options :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk364/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080211f5c.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk364/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080211f5c.shtml&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In 2nd solution also, you may use PIX behind the router for regular security purposes with security policies.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3rd solution : You may use 2 routers 2800 and terminate ISP links on both of them and run GLBP between them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;here is the PIX load balancing g. Load balancing is supported in PIX from 7.0 onwards only :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008054c4b7.html#wp1102712" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008054c4b7.html#wp1102712&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aashish C&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:23:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balancing-across-two-pixes-525/m-p/604252#M526606</guid>
      <dc:creator>aashish.c</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-13T11:23:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load balancing across two Pixes 525</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balancing-across-two-pixes-525/m-p/604253#M526608</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know that I ask too much but only this one and that's it. Could I use ASA 5520 istead of Pix 525? I mean are those documentations and suggestions right for ASA5520? Same story, different device &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:43:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balancing-across-two-pixes-525/m-p/604253#M526608</guid>
      <dc:creator>miloskv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-13T11:43:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load balancing across two Pixes 525</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balancing-across-two-pixes-525/m-p/604254#M526610</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mr.Miloskv,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ASA 5520 is the best selection in place of pix  because 5520 supports active/active load balancing and nultiple default routes to the next hop.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:31:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balancing-across-two-pixes-525/m-p/604254#M526610</guid>
      <dc:creator>arumugasamy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-24T09:31:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load balancing across two Pixes 525</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balancing-across-two-pixes-525/m-p/604255#M526612</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Remember that active/active supports asymetrical load balancing&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 12:55:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balancing-across-two-pixes-525/m-p/604255#M526612</guid>
      <dc:creator>jcockburn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-24T12:55:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

