<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX 515 with 2 internal interfaces in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-515-with-2-internal-interfaces/m-p/532936#M527117</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I apologize if the following is too basic. I don't know your level of expertise.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do the nodes on the 10.1.0.0/16 network have a route back to 10.80.0.0/16? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example, consider the inside route from the PIX is to a router whose IP is 10.1.1.1. There is a statement on 10.1.1.1 to route the 10.80.0.0/16 subnet to the PIX. This allows you to ping the router. Now, continuing the example, you have a node with IP 10.1.2.50/16 and it has a gw of 10.1.2.1/16. The 10.1.2.1/16 router does not have a route back to PIX, or to the upstream router, and 10.80.0.0/16 hosts will not be able to ping 10.1.2.50.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 07:59:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>riteshsynchro</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-02-26T07:59:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX 515 with 2 internal interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-515-with-2-internal-interfaces/m-p/532935#M527115</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a pix 515 6.3.  Currently have client vpns etc. with no problems.  I would like to use my eth4 interface and a separate subnet for vpn clients to hand off to an internal router.  I specified a access list with nat (eth4) 0 access-list for this ip range.  My internal subnet is 10.1/16 and new client range is 10.80/16.  My clients can authenticate and ping the internal router, but all other traffic has no xlate when trying to get to my 10.1 network. Any assistance would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:44:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-515-with-2-internal-interfaces/m-p/532935#M527115</guid>
      <dc:creator>gdeangelis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T08:44:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX 515 with 2 internal interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-515-with-2-internal-interfaces/m-p/532936#M527117</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I apologize if the following is too basic. I don't know your level of expertise.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do the nodes on the 10.1.0.0/16 network have a route back to 10.80.0.0/16? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example, consider the inside route from the PIX is to a router whose IP is 10.1.1.1. There is a statement on 10.1.1.1 to route the 10.80.0.0/16 subnet to the PIX. This allows you to ping the router. Now, continuing the example, you have a node with IP 10.1.2.50/16 and it has a gw of 10.1.2.1/16. The 10.1.2.1/16 router does not have a route back to PIX, or to the upstream router, and 10.80.0.0/16 hosts will not be able to ping 10.1.2.50.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 07:59:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-515-with-2-internal-interfaces/m-p/532936#M527117</guid>
      <dc:creator>riteshsynchro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-02-26T07:59:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX 515 with 2 internal interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-515-with-2-internal-interfaces/m-p/532937#M527119</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Routing doesn't seem to be the problem.  I have the 2nd inside interface on a vlan port on a 6500 w/msfc.  All internal hosts can get to the the 10.80 w/no problem.  The pix is dropping the traffic w/ (no xlate 10.80.x.x to 10.255.255.255), but I can't nail down why.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:15:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-515-with-2-internal-interfaces/m-p/532937#M527119</guid>
      <dc:creator>gdeangelis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-02-26T17:15:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX 515 with 2 internal interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-515-with-2-internal-interfaces/m-p/532938#M527121</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure what you mean by no xlate. Since you are doing a nat 0 on the VPN traffic, no translations are performed, and there wouldn't be any corresponding xlate entries...right?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From what I understand about Cisco firewalls, an xlate entry is only created when an address translation is needed. I think you not seeing xlates on VPN traffic is normal for a PIX.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:24:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-515-with-2-internal-interfaces/m-p/532938#M527121</guid>
      <dc:creator>riteshsynchro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-02-26T18:24:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX 515 with 2 internal interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-515-with-2-internal-interfaces/m-p/532939#M527123</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In looking at my syslog, all traffic other than pings generate a no xlate error.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 22:50:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-515-with-2-internal-interfaces/m-p/532939#M527123</guid>
      <dc:creator>gdeangelis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-02-27T22:50:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

