<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic move asa5520 failover interface in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/move-asa5520-failover-interface/m-p/1694830#M529540</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you are running stateful failover this could be an issue, see the following Cisco Support Forum thread:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://community.cisco.com/message/3106018#3106018"&gt;https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3106018#3106018&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you are using stateless failover then this should not be an issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let me know if this answers your question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Loren&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:03:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Loren Kolnes</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-06-22T17:03:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>move asa5520 failover interface</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/move-asa5520-failover-interface/m-p/1694829#M529539</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am currently using g0/3 for failover between my two ASA5520's.&amp;nbsp; I would like to move that to the management interface to free up g0/3 for a second DMZ segment.&amp;nbsp; are there any implications to doing this live other than i would only have a single ASA during the move?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 20:48:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/move-asa5520-failover-interface/m-p/1694829#M529539</guid>
      <dc:creator>bmarms</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T20:48:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>move asa5520 failover interface</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/move-asa5520-failover-interface/m-p/1694830#M529540</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you are running stateful failover this could be an issue, see the following Cisco Support Forum thread:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://community.cisco.com/message/3106018#3106018"&gt;https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3106018#3106018&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you are using stateless failover then this should not be an issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let me know if this answers your question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Loren&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:03:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/move-asa5520-failover-interface/m-p/1694830#M529540</guid>
      <dc:creator>Loren Kolnes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-22T17:03:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

