<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Bridge Interfaces on Pix 515? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bridge-interfaces-on-pix-515/m-p/412911#M529807</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;please excuse me for misunderstanding. anyhow, pix doesn't permit two interfaces on the same subnet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 23:45:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jackko</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-12-07T23:45:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Bridge Interfaces on Pix 515?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bridge-interfaces-on-pix-515/m-p/412910#M529804</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I do not believe I can do this, but need to ask anyway, I have a set of Pix 515e in Active/Standby, and will have a HA pair of Proxy Servers behind the Pix, directly connected. So I have 2 interfaces on each Pix Inside 2 Inside 3. Inside 2 goes to Proxy 1 and Inside 3 goes to Proxy 2. What you end up with is each proxy has a connection to each of the Pix, for a total of 4 connections.Ideally they would like to bridge Inside 2, to be on the same subnet and share an IP. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If that does not work, I thought I would just set them up as Inside 2 as 192.168.2.10, and then Inside 3 as 192.168.3.10. I would then put routing costs on Inside 2 and Inside 3, with Inside 2 as the main interface, and if it goes down, then try Inside 3. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:34:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bridge-interfaces-on-pix-515/m-p/412910#M529804</guid>
      <dc:creator>rasputinj1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T08:34:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bridge Interfaces on Pix 515?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bridge-interfaces-on-pix-515/m-p/412911#M529807</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;please excuse me for misunderstanding. anyhow, pix doesn't permit two interfaces on the same subnet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 23:45:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bridge-interfaces-on-pix-515/m-p/412911#M529807</guid>
      <dc:creator>jackko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-12-07T23:45:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

