<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX Failover Problems in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-problems/m-p/495741#M530044</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you doing Serial Cable Based Stateful Failover?  If so, make sure the serial cable is connected to the appropriate FW.  The ends are marked Primary and Secondary.  Next, you need to setup the rest of the failover... like:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nameif ethernet4 FAILOVER sec50&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface ethernet4 100full&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip address FAILOVER 172.16.4.1 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover ip address FAILOVER 172.16.4.2 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover ip address outside 192.168.1.11&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover ip address inside 10.200.0.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover link FAILOVER&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 23:08:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jwalker</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-12-01T23:08:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX Failover Problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-problems/m-p/495739#M530040</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have two PIX515 firewalls.  One has a UR license and one has an FO license.  I am not using LAN-based Stateful Failover and running 7.0(2) software.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My problem is that the failover doesn't seem to be working properly.  I appear to be able to failover to the secondary unit fine, but if I do anything at all to the primary unit (which is in Standby according to 'show failover' output), I can no longer pass traffic on the Secondary (now primary) unit.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For instance - if I simply unplug either of the ethernet interfaces on the Primary, I can no longer ping the default gateway on the inside interface and thus cannot pass traffic through the Active firewall.  If I turn off the Primary, I cannot pass traffic through the Active firewall.  If I disable failover entirely and disconnect the serial cable, I still cannot do anything to the Primary, or I end up losing connectivity.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From what I can see, everything is configured properly and there's not really any complicated options to set when configuring failover.  The failover config is below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover polltime unit 1 holdtime 3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover polltime interface 3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface Ethernet0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; speed 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; duplex full&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; nameif outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; security-level 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; ip address 192.168.1.10 255.255.255.240 standby 192.168.1.11 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface Ethernet1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; speed 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; duplex full&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; nameif inside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; security-level 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; ip address 10.200.0.1 255.255.255.248 standby 10.200.0.2 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there something I'm missing?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:33:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-problems/m-p/495739#M530040</guid>
      <dc:creator>evantol</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T08:33:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX Failover Problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-problems/m-p/495740#M530042</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;can you send output of show failover from both pix&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;can you send output of show interface from both pix&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nadeem&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 22:15:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-problems/m-p/495740#M530042</guid>
      <dc:creator>nkhawaja</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-12-01T22:15:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX Failover Problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-problems/m-p/495741#M530044</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you doing Serial Cable Based Stateful Failover?  If so, make sure the serial cable is connected to the appropriate FW.  The ends are marked Primary and Secondary.  Next, you need to setup the rest of the failover... like:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nameif ethernet4 FAILOVER sec50&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface ethernet4 100full&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip address FAILOVER 172.16.4.1 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover ip address FAILOVER 172.16.4.2 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover ip address outside 192.168.1.11&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover ip address inside 10.200.0.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover link FAILOVER&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 23:08:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-problems/m-p/495741#M530044</guid>
      <dc:creator>jwalker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-12-01T23:08:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX Failover Problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-problems/m-p/495742#M530046</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not doing stateful failover, as I mentioned in the original post.  The cable is plugged in properly.  It would generate an error if it wasn't.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 01:52:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-problems/m-p/495742#M530046</guid>
      <dc:creator>evantol</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-12-02T01:52:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX Failover Problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-problems/m-p/495743#M530048</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry for the late response.   The output has been attached.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 23:32:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-problems/m-p/495743#M530048</guid>
      <dc:creator>evantol</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-12-07T23:32:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

