<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Network range NAT in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/network-range-nat/m-p/1760767#M530438</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi VIpin, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All you are saying is correct, yes you can Nat these IPs to the same IPs, you can do NoNat for the servers and you can also do:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 192.16.2.0 192.16.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Everything is correct in your statements. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mike &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 04:47:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Maykol Rojas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-09-19T04:47:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Network range NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/network-range-nat/m-p/1760766#M530431</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have some servers in my inside network. all of them having public IPs. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do i need to NAT these Public IPs with the same Public IPs???&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can i use NO NAT for these servers and permitt all traffic from outside to these servers?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any way to NAT a range of IP address, say 192.168.2.0/24 is my public IP range&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;can i NAT like this??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 192.16.2.0 192.16.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vipin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 21:26:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/network-range-nat/m-p/1760766#M530431</guid>
      <dc:creator>vipinrajrc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T21:26:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Network range NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/network-range-nat/m-p/1760767#M530438</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi VIpin, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All you are saying is correct, yes you can Nat these IPs to the same IPs, you can do NoNat for the servers and you can also do:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 192.16.2.0 192.16.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Everything is correct in your statements. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mike &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 04:47:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/network-range-nat/m-p/1760767#M530438</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maykol Rojas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-19T04:47:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

