<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX 7.0(4) Hairpinning or routing through the same interface in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-7-0-4-hairpinning-or-routing-through-the-same-interface/m-p/455785#M530439</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have set this up for hub and spoke vpn clients and it works like a charm. I used the same-security-traffic perpit intra-interface. The key here is intra-interface which specifies ipsec traffic, if you use inter-interface it allows communication between interfaces with the same security level but you would need a seperate physical interface.....have a look at the command guide here&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_sw/v_70/cmd_ref/index.htm" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_sw/v_70/cmd_ref/index.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:22:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>v-naughton</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-11-30T17:22:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX 7.0(4) Hairpinning or routing through the same interface</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-7-0-4-hairpinning-or-routing-through-the-same-interface/m-p/455783#M530428</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have read that PIX version 7 and up allows "hairpinning" encrypted traffic. That's beautiful, but did someone find out how to route regular IP traffic through the same interface (same security level) on a PIX running version 7up? Alernatively, can we do it through a loopback interface like with IOS ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Simon Laurin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:32:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-7-0-4-hairpinning-or-routing-through-the-same-interface/m-p/455783#M530428</guid>
      <dc:creator>slaurin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T08:32:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX 7.0(4) Hairpinning or routing through the same interface</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-7-0-4-hairpinning-or-routing-through-the-same-interface/m-p/455784#M530434</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it isn't possible with PIXs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At this moment FWSM supports this feature (routing through the same interface), I think that Cisco will add this feature on PIXs in a near future ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Juan.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:28:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-7-0-4-hairpinning-or-routing-through-the-same-interface/m-p/455784#M530434</guid>
      <dc:creator>j.docio</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-11-24T11:28:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX 7.0(4) Hairpinning or routing through the same interface</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-7-0-4-hairpinning-or-routing-through-the-same-interface/m-p/455785#M530439</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have set this up for hub and spoke vpn clients and it works like a charm. I used the same-security-traffic perpit intra-interface. The key here is intra-interface which specifies ipsec traffic, if you use inter-interface it allows communication between interfaces with the same security level but you would need a seperate physical interface.....have a look at the command guide here&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_sw/v_70/cmd_ref/index.htm" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_sw/v_70/cmd_ref/index.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:22:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-7-0-4-hairpinning-or-routing-through-the-same-interface/m-p/455785#M530439</guid>
      <dc:creator>v-naughton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-11-30T17:22:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

