<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Failover cluster uptime? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-cluster-uptime/m-p/1751254#M530624</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Thanks guys - this makes sense now. Even though I had to replace both units - I made sure the cluster remained active throughout hence the difference in up-times.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:14:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tony Riccardi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-09-19T16:14:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Failover cluster uptime?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-cluster-uptime/m-p/1751249#M530614</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can anyone confirm what the difference between the device "up time" and the "failover cluster" uptime is as per the "show ver" output below? i've just installed a new cluster using 2 new ASA and received the below outputs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;asa-firewall&amp;gt; sh ver&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version 8.2(1)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Compiled on Tue 05-May-09 22:45 by builders&lt;BR /&gt;System image file is "disk0:/asa821-k8.bin"&lt;BR /&gt;Config file at boot was "startup-config"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;asa-firewall up 2 days 22 hours&lt;BR /&gt;failover cluster up 1 year 79 days&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hardware:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ASA5550, 4096 MB RAM, CPU Pentium 4 3000 MHz&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 21:25:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-cluster-uptime/m-p/1751249#M530614</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tony Riccardi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T21:25:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Failover cluster uptime?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-cluster-uptime/m-p/1751250#M530616</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Tony,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ASA-Firewall up time is, that particular firewall is up since 2 days from the last reboot.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover cluster up is that the failover has been working fine on yuor setup for the last 1 year and havent ever been disable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let me know if you have any questions,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Varun&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:23:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-cluster-uptime/m-p/1751250#M530616</guid>
      <dc:creator>varrao</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-16T15:23:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Failover cluster uptime?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-cluster-uptime/m-p/1751251#M530618</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tony&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I agree with the explanation of Varun. When you configure a failover cluster it starts measuring the uptime of the cluster. If the active ASA goes down then the standby ASA becomes active and the cluster continues to be up. When the first ASA reboots its system uptime starts over again but the cluster up time has continued without interruption.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But I am puzzled by something in your post. You say: "i've just installed a new cluster using 2 new ASA". But if it is really a new cluster and new ASAs then I do not see how the cluster uptime could be a year 79 days. Were they really new ASAs?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rick&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:48:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-cluster-uptime/m-p/1751251#M530618</guid>
      <dc:creator>Richard Burts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-16T15:48:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Failover cluster uptime?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-cluster-uptime/m-p/1751252#M530619</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rick,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I had a pair of ASAs in a cluster which both failed at the same time. So I RMA'ed them and received 2 replacements from Cisco.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After setting up the new cluster using the replacement units I issued a "show ver" and receveid the above output.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does this suggests that these firewalls were previously turned on and configured as part of another cluster?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:17:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-cluster-uptime/m-p/1751252#M530619</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tony Riccardi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-16T16:17:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Failover cluster uptime?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-cluster-uptime/m-p/1751253#M530621</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tony,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I take it that you replaced one unit at a time on the failover cluster without suffering downtime. So, what you see it to be expected.&amp;nbsp; Your failover cluster has been up for more than a year but, individual firewall up time is shorter as they got replaced/rebooted.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-KS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:29:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-cluster-uptime/m-p/1751253#M530621</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kureli Sankar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-16T18:29:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Failover cluster uptime?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-cluster-uptime/m-p/1751254#M530624</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Thanks guys - this makes sense now. Even though I had to replace both units - I made sure the cluster remained active throughout hence the difference in up-times.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:14:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-cluster-uptime/m-p/1751254#M530624</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tony Riccardi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-19T16:14:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Failover cluster uptime?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-cluster-uptime/m-p/1751255#M530627</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Glad we could help you out with it &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/4.5.4/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Varun&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:27:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-cluster-uptime/m-p/1751255#M530627</guid>
      <dc:creator>varrao</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-19T16:27:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Failover cluster uptime?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-cluster-uptime/m-p/1751256#M530629</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Exactly.&amp;nbsp; Would appreciate if you could mark this thread answered. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;KS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 01:10:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-cluster-uptime/m-p/1751256#M530629</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kureli Sankar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-20T01:10:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

