<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX with Draytek 2900 in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-with-draytek-2900/m-p/500447#M530957</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The issue may be due to&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IKE: Failing on Phase 1 negotiation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Group [3002group]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;authentication required but selected Proposal does not support authentication,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check priorities of IKE xauth proposals in IKE proposal list.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:07:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>b.hsu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-11-11T15:07:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX with Draytek 2900</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-with-draytek-2900/m-p/500446#M530956</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;HI all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to get a Draytek Vigor 2900 to talk through ipsec vpn to a PIX 515E running OS7.0.4. The pix has a fixed IP-Address and the Vigor has a DSL-Line connected providing changing addresses. The PIX-Log tells me "All IPSec SA proposals found unacceptable!" after the connection to the dynamic map and the default L2L-Group.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anybody give me a hint what to do?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Every help is welcome.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alexander Ott&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:30:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-with-draytek-2900/m-p/500446#M530956</guid>
      <dc:creator>alexander.ott</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T08:30:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX with Draytek 2900</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-with-draytek-2900/m-p/500447#M530957</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The issue may be due to&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IKE: Failing on Phase 1 negotiation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Group [3002group]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;authentication required but selected Proposal does not support authentication,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check priorities of IKE xauth proposals in IKE proposal list.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:07:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-with-draytek-2900/m-p/500447#M530957</guid>
      <dc:creator>b.hsu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-11-11T15:07:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX with Draytek 2900</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-with-draytek-2900/m-p/500448#M530958</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for your answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Finally we got another hint which solved the problem. Actually the proposals were wrong. The Draytek was set to "no pfs" which was not abbreviated in the Draytec's html-page. So we set the pix to "no pfs" and finally it worked.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alex&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 07:49:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-with-draytek-2900/m-p/500448#M530958</guid>
      <dc:creator>alexander.ott</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-11-14T07:49:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

