<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Multiple NAT rule is possible???? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-nat-rule-is-possible/m-p/1784275#M531141</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to create multiple NAT rule for a single IP?&amp;nbsp; If it is Yes, in the case of exchange server how is the working? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vipin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 21:23:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>vipinrajrc</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T21:23:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple NAT rule is possible????</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-nat-rule-is-possible/m-p/1784275#M531141</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to create multiple NAT rule for a single IP?&amp;nbsp; If it is Yes, in the case of exchange server how is the working? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vipin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 21:23:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-nat-rule-is-possible/m-p/1784275#M531141</guid>
      <dc:creator>vipinrajrc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T21:23:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple NAT rule is possible????</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-nat-rule-is-possible/m-p/1784276#M531143</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Vipin,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lets say that the Private ip address of the Exchange server located on the inside interface its 192.168.10.2 and the public one is 60.60.60.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So you want to create a multiple nat rule for that server pointing to the same Public IP. one on port 25&amp;nbsp; and the other one on port 389.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So the nat rules are going to be:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Static (inside,outside) tcp 60.60.60.1 25 192.168.10.2 25&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Static (inside,outside) tcp 60.60.60.1 389 192.168.10.2 389&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And you can keep doing this with all the ports you need to use for this server.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope this help you, If you need anything else just let me know&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julio&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 03:07:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-nat-rule-is-possible/m-p/1784276#M531143</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-12T03:07:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple NAT rule is possible????</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-nat-rule-is-possible/m-p/1784277#M531145</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But what about different public IPs to the same private IP???&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Say public IP : 60.60.60.1, 70.60.60.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Private : 192.168.10.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vipin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 03:42:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-nat-rule-is-possible/m-p/1784277#M531145</guid>
      <dc:creator>vipinrajrc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-12T03:42:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple NAT rule is possible????</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-nat-rule-is-possible/m-p/1784278#M531147</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Vipin,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="border-collapse: collapse; list-style-type: none;"&gt;Static (inside,outside) tcp 60.60.60.1 25 192.168.10.2 25&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="border-collapse: collapse; list-style-type: none;"&gt;Static (inside,outside) tcp70.60.60.2 389 192.168.10.2 389&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="border-collapse: collapse; list-style-type: none;"&gt;If you use port forwarding it should work but doing just a static one to one the ASA I dont thinks that is going to work because there is going to be a conflict on the configuration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="border-collapse: collapse; list-style-type: none;"&gt;Regards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 03:56:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-nat-rule-is-possible/m-p/1784278#M531147</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-12T03:56:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple NAT rule is possible????</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-nat-rule-is-possible/m-p/1784279#M531151</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It would work, but as per Nat order it would only make outbound connections using the first one. Inbound connections will work for both 60.60.60.1 and 70.70.70.2 (Talking 8.2 and below)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mike &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 04:20:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-nat-rule-is-possible/m-p/1784279#M531151</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maykol Rojas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-12T04:20:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple NAT rule is possible????</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-nat-rule-is-possible/m-p/1784280#M531154</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Vipin,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You would need to&amp;nbsp; to use policy nat for it:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list abc permit ip host 192.168.10.2 any&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list xyz permit ip host 192.168.10.2 any&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 60.60.60.1 access-list abc&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 70.60.60.2 access-list xyz&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let me know if this works for you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can usne this thread as reference:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://community.cisco.com/message/3428828#3428828"&gt;https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3428828#3428828&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Varun&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 04:25:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-nat-rule-is-possible/m-p/1784280#M531154</guid>
      <dc:creator>varrao</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-12T04:25:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

