<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic FWSM Module VS Pix Firewall in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-module-vs-pix-firewall/m-p/470622#M531260</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the difference between FWSM modules of 6500 switch vs PIX firewall hardware.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also can somebody give the PRO's and CON's of both the module when positioning.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which one is better FWSM or PIX firewall.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Deepak&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:29:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>fmatrine</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T08:29:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FWSM Module VS Pix Firewall</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-module-vs-pix-firewall/m-p/470622#M531260</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the difference between FWSM modules of 6500 switch vs PIX firewall hardware.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also can somebody give the PRO's and CON's of both the module when positioning.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which one is better FWSM or PIX firewall.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Deepak&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:29:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-module-vs-pix-firewall/m-p/470622#M531260</guid>
      <dc:creator>fmatrine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T08:29:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FWSM Module VS Pix Firewall</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-module-vs-pix-firewall/m-p/470623#M531262</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the notable difference which i could find between FWSM and PIX but FWSM uses the same technology or operational method similar to the PIX.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also the IOS versions , CLIs too are similar to PIX..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You must also use the access-list command to implement access lists that permit traffic to flow through the FWSM. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By default, access lists deny all traffic on all interfaces (deny ip any any). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This behavior differs from the PIX's default configuration, which allows traffic from higher to lower security and denies traffic from lower to higher security. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To get the FWSM to behave like the PIX, configure an access list with permit ip any any and apply it to the high-security interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for more info do check the data sheets of both FWSM and PIX..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2706/products_data_sheet0900aecd80281886.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2706/products_data_sheet0900aecd80281886.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_data_sheets_list.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_data_sheets_list.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regds&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 06:17:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-module-vs-pix-firewall/m-p/470623#M531262</guid>
      <dc:creator>spremkumar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-31T06:17:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

