<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ASA 5585, Active/Active and shared interface design in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5585-active-active-and-shared-interface-design/m-p/1766709#M533201</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, hopefully a quick question on the use of a pair of ASA 5585's in active/active mode with a shared outside interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Last time I did this was with FWSM, there was a restriction where all contexts that share an outside interface have to be in the same failover group.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does this apply also to the ASA? My thought is that it will, but I am unable to find that in any documentation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My 5585's will be running 8.4 code.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Andy &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 21:13:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>aacole</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T21:13:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA 5585, Active/Active and shared interface design</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5585-active-active-and-shared-interface-design/m-p/1766709#M533201</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, hopefully a quick question on the use of a pair of ASA 5585's in active/active mode with a shared outside interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Last time I did this was with FWSM, there was a restriction where all contexts that share an outside interface have to be in the same failover group.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does this apply also to the ASA? My thought is that it will, but I am unable to find that in any documentation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My 5585's will be running 8.4 code.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Andy &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 21:13:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5585-active-active-and-shared-interface-design/m-p/1766709#M533201</guid>
      <dc:creator>aacole</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T21:13:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA 5585, Failover, Active/Active and shared interface desig</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5585-active-active-and-shared-interface-design/m-p/1766710#M533204</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ha, answered my own question, the reference is in that excellent book by Jazib Frahim and Omar Santos, `Cisco ASA: All in one firewall, IPS and VPN adaptive security appliance' on page 353, knew I read it somewhere!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The contexts sharing an interface need&amp;nbsp; to be in the same failover group.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unless anyone knows different....&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Message was edited by: ANDY COLE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:24:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5585-active-active-and-shared-interface-design/m-p/1766710#M533204</guid>
      <dc:creator>aacole</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-08-18T10:24:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

