<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Securing Traffic through PIX in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/securing-traffic-through-pix/m-p/499332#M534060</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Site-to-Site comes to mind! and tie down the vpn traffic using ACLs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jay&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 11:10:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jmia</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-08-18T11:10:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Securing Traffic through PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/securing-traffic-through-pix/m-p/499330#M534056</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We want to give network access to our business partner (Banks)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also we want to secure our infrastructure from banks activities.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can i acheive ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pls suggest...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Attaching the proposed topology diagram.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:20:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/securing-traffic-through-pix/m-p/499330#M534056</guid>
      <dc:creator>fmatrine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T08:20:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Securing Traffic through PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/securing-traffic-through-pix/m-p/499331#M534058</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;attached topology&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 11:10:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/securing-traffic-through-pix/m-p/499331#M534058</guid>
      <dc:creator>fmatrine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-08-18T11:10:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Securing Traffic through PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/securing-traffic-through-pix/m-p/499332#M534060</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Site-to-Site comes to mind! and tie down the vpn traffic using ACLs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jay&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 11:10:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/securing-traffic-through-pix/m-p/499332#M534060</guid>
      <dc:creator>jmia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-08-18T11:10:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Securing Traffic through PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/securing-traffic-through-pix/m-p/499333#M534061</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your topology looks ok but what I would suggest is for you to read the Cisco SAFE Security Blueprint, it can be found on the right hand side of this page under 'Related Links' or below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns340/ns394/ns171/ns128/networking_solutions_package.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns340/ns394/ns171/ns128/networking_solutions_package.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps a little.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jay&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 11:34:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/securing-traffic-through-pix/m-p/499333#M534061</guid>
      <dc:creator>jmia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-08-18T11:34:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Securing Traffic through PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/securing-traffic-through-pix/m-p/499334#M534062</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Jay,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanx for the reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are not looking at VPN solution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As the business partner will come over private leased line and not thru internet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our requirement is to allow business partners (Many Banks) to access few of our servers in DMZ and Inside network in a secured manner.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Banks network will come over wan and in our premises we will get a ethernet from all the banks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what we are planning is to terminate all the ethernet coming from different banks on a L3 switch in different vlan interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Purpose of creating vlans on the L3 is to control the traffic (Inter-vlan) coming from different banks and filtering the traffic at the L3 only.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;secondly we will have the L3 connected to PIX interface facing the Bank-Zone as shown in the proposed topology attached.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We will create a static NAT between Bank-Zone interface subnet and various servers in DMZ and Internal network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Subsequently we will allow the services for specific IP's only.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This way we will hide our inside+dmz private ip to be seen by bank network, as the bank clients will connect to the natted ip for accessing servers in DMZ and inside lan.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kindly suggest if this is OK from security perspective or do we need to add any component.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:27:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/securing-traffic-through-pix/m-p/499334#M534062</guid>
      <dc:creator>fmatrine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-08-18T12:27:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Securing Traffic through PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/securing-traffic-through-pix/m-p/499335#M534063</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It looks like you are setting this up very well, maybe tighten it up to only allow to specific TCP services on the servers? And I would LOG, LOG, LOG, all activity to/from these extranet partners. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good points I see:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1: VLAN separation of banks from each other!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;     (access-lists, no traffic between bank vlans)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2: NAT of your internal servers to extranet&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3: Access only to specific servers (nat address) from banks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      (lock down to ports/services?)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would think about adding an IDS/IPS component, to be sure that nobody attempts to circumvent your security arrangements.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 19:48:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/securing-traffic-through-pix/m-p/499335#M534063</guid>
      <dc:creator>rsmith</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-08-19T19:48:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

