<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX syslog servers in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-syslog-servers/m-p/469925#M534374</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, don't forget that unless you are using syslog over TCP, syslog is based on UDP (i.e. "spray and pray"). There is no guarantee of delivery with UDP, so occasional messages could be dropping within your network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:55:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tbissett</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-08-16T19:55:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX syslog servers</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-syslog-servers/m-p/469921#M534346</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Our pix is sending syslog messages to two servers.  The servers archive messages every hour.  Why would one server have 2% larger files than the other?  Does the pix have a first choice server?  thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:19:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-syslog-servers/m-p/469921#M534346</guid>
      <dc:creator>abevers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T08:19:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX syslog servers</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-syslog-servers/m-p/469922#M534355</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is your syslog software configured the same on both machines? They could be logging at different log levels. The same goes for the PIX, it can log at different log levels to different syslog servers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:22:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-syslog-servers/m-p/469922#M534355</guid>
      <dc:creator>Solace</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-08-10T17:22:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX syslog servers</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-syslog-servers/m-p/469923#M534362</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The software (Kiwi) is configured the same but the machines are not.  One is an XP workstation and one is a 2003 server.  Is there a way to tell if messages are being dropped?  maybe compare message count on the pix with message count on the servers?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 17:40:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-syslog-servers/m-p/469923#M534362</guid>
      <dc:creator>abevers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-08-16T17:40:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX syslog servers</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-syslog-servers/m-p/469924#M534367</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are both disk partitions NTFS or FAT?  If they are different file structures, then that would clearly explain it.  It might also be the file structure on the server versus workstation.  All things being equal, you should expect equal file sizes, but all things are not equal in your configuration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:40:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-syslog-servers/m-p/469924#M534367</guid>
      <dc:creator>jphilope</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-08-16T19:40:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX syslog servers</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-syslog-servers/m-p/469925#M534374</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, don't forget that unless you are using syslog over TCP, syslog is based on UDP (i.e. "spray and pray"). There is no guarantee of delivery with UDP, so occasional messages could be dropping within your network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:55:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-syslog-servers/m-p/469925#M534374</guid>
      <dc:creator>tbissett</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-08-16T19:55:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

