<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic IPS etherchannel load balancing design in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-etherchannel-load-balancing-design/m-p/2299774#M53527</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you sure it's possible with interface pair, from my reading it said only with vlan pairs. Symmetry will either be achieved with OSPF or using FHRP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The CAT6K do not support VSS they are seperate but the FWSMs in them act as active/standby&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 14:54:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>revolwireless</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-08-07T14:54:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IPS etherchannel load balancing design</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-etherchannel-load-balancing-design/m-p/2299772#M53525</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to do a etherchannel load balancing with the design attached? i know I need to configure vlan pairs but I'm not sure if it's possible with my current design&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 13:01:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-etherchannel-load-balancing-design/m-p/2299772#M53525</guid>
      <dc:creator>revolwireless</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T13:01:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IPS etherchannel load balancing design</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-etherchannel-load-balancing-design/m-p/2299773#M53526</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Etherchannel design will work with interface pair as well ,provided the design is appropriate to take care of the asymmetry.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Coming to your design, if i understand the requirement correctly, you wish to create etherchannel between 3750 stacked switch and the pair of CAT6K. Enabling VSS on the pair of CAT6K switches and then creating etherchannel should help.But the flow symmetry will not be guaranteed ( meaning the same IPS may not see the forward and the reverse packets of the flow).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 13:38:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-etherchannel-load-balancing-design/m-p/2299773#M53526</guid>
      <dc:creator>gaurash2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-06T13:38:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IPS etherchannel load balancing design</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-etherchannel-load-balancing-design/m-p/2299774#M53527</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you sure it's possible with interface pair, from my reading it said only with vlan pairs. Symmetry will either be achieved with OSPF or using FHRP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The CAT6K do not support VSS they are seperate but the FWSMs in them act as active/standby&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 14:54:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-etherchannel-load-balancing-design/m-p/2299774#M53527</guid>
      <dc:creator>revolwireless</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-07T14:54:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IPS etherchannel load balancing design</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-etherchannel-load-balancing-design/m-p/2299775#M53528</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes it will work. Consider the following topology:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;IMG src="http://supportforums.cisco.com/sites/default/files/legacy/7/7/0/151077-Demo.jpg" class="jive-image" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It will work for static port channel as well as LACP based Port channel. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2013 09:42:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-etherchannel-load-balancing-design/m-p/2299775#M53528</guid>
      <dc:creator>gaurash2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-14T09:42:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

