<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX failover -From swamy in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-from-swamy/m-p/477894#M535298</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Swamy,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What version of PIX? For failover, i recommend 7.0 for datacenter.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 18:08:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kamlesh.patel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-07-16T18:08:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX failover -From swamy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-from-swamy/m-p/477893#M535297</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need your help on this design to work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are 2 pix in failover config, with each pix inside connected to separate core switch 4507R that are connected as failover configuration.In brief, PIX A inside connected to core A switch then PIX B inside connected to Core B switch.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since core B is in reduntant config how can we achieve the failover while the connection between core A and PIX A broken.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This setup has been proposed for the Data Centre project. Pls I want it in bit urgent.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in Advance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;swamy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:16:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-from-swamy/m-p/477893#M535297</guid>
      <dc:creator>arumugasamy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T08:16:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX failover -From swamy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-from-swamy/m-p/477894#M535298</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Swamy,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What version of PIX? For failover, i recommend 7.0 for datacenter.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 18:08:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-from-swamy/m-p/477894#M535298</guid>
      <dc:creator>kamlesh.patel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-07-16T18:08:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX failover -From swamy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-from-swamy/m-p/477895#M535299</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mr.Kamlesh,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pix with 6.3 OS is used. Could you provide me the solution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;swamy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 05:33:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-from-swamy/m-p/477895#M535299</guid>
      <dc:creator>arumugasamy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-07-20T05:33:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

