<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Abandoning Router IPS Modules? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/abandoning-router-ips-modules/m-p/2121513#M54132</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; That is a bummer. I ordered the IPS NME K9 module along with a 2911 ISR last year. They make for a great combination within a small business environment at a reasonable cost. Once again, I am nuged in a direction to have to spend more money for a solution where current products fit the bill quite nicely. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Such is the deal I suppose......&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 15:13:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>turnera</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-02-01T15:13:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Abandoning Router IPS Modules?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/abandoning-router-ips-modules/m-p/2121511#M54130</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I attended an IPS training a few weeks back where the instructor said that Cisco would be abandoning the option of having IPS modules in routers.&amp;nbsp; Is this the case?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 12:53:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/abandoning-router-ips-modules/m-p/2121511#M54130</guid>
      <dc:creator>Heath Mote</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T12:53:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Abandoning Router IPS Modules?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/abandoning-router-ips-modules/m-p/2121512#M54131</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, that' right. The NM-IPS was announced EOS/EOL two months ago, but I think the AIM-IPS for the ISR-G1 is not announced EOS/EOL yet.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps5729/ps5713/ps2113/eol_C51-720154.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps5729/ps5713/ps2113/eol_C51-720154.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 07:48:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/abandoning-router-ips-modules/m-p/2121512#M54131</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-01T07:48:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Abandoning Router IPS Modules?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/abandoning-router-ips-modules/m-p/2121513#M54132</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; That is a bummer. I ordered the IPS NME K9 module along with a 2911 ISR last year. They make for a great combination within a small business environment at a reasonable cost. Once again, I am nuged in a direction to have to spend more money for a solution where current products fit the bill quite nicely. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Such is the deal I suppose......&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 15:13:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/abandoning-router-ips-modules/m-p/2121513#M54132</guid>
      <dc:creator>turnera</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-01T15:13:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

