<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Problems with an internal - internal PIX deployment in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/problems-with-an-internal-internal-pix-deployment/m-p/389797#M542498</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In order for you to use 130.123.128.1 or 130.123.128.2, you need to added below Statements:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;snmp-server host massey  130.123.128.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;snmp-server host massey 130.123.128.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MD&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2005 21:06:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>msdesai</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-01-17T21:06:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Problems with an internal - internal PIX deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/problems-with-an-internal-internal-pix-deployment/m-p/389791#M542488</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have put in a PIX 506E with a small community of internal users isolated behind it.  The small community will still use the corporate lan to access the internet so I have the small part on inside and the corporate lan on outside.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have added an 'ip all all' on the outside interface to try to get things working but no go so far.  I can ping from the PIX to outside hosts but config tftp fails as do snmp polls from the outside.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;debug shows no packet activity for tftp, only the inbound packet for snmp.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:52:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/problems-with-an-internal-internal-pix-deployment/m-p/389791#M542488</guid>
      <dc:creator>geustace</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T07:52:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems with an internal - internal PIX deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/problems-with-an-internal-internal-pix-deployment/m-p/389792#M542489</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you please post your config?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do have Static NAT configured?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MD&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2005 02:02:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/problems-with-an-internal-internal-pix-deployment/m-p/389792#M542489</guid>
      <dc:creator>msdesai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-01-17T02:02:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems with an internal - internal PIX deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/problems-with-an-internal-internal-pix-deployment/m-p/389793#M542490</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;PIX Version 6.3(4)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface ethernet0 10full&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface ethernet1 100full&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nameif ethernet0 massey security10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nameif ethernet1 inside security100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;enable password ********* encrypted&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;passwd ******* encrypted&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hostname mu-firewall-4&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;domain-name massey.ac.nz&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fixup protocol dns maximum-length 512&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fixup protocol ftp 21&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fixup protocol h323 h225 1720&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fixup protocol h323 ras 1718-1719&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no fixup protocol http 80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no fixup protocol rsh 514&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fixup protocol rtsp 554&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fixup protocol sip 5060&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fixup protocol sip udp 5060&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fixup protocol skinny 2000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no fixup protocol smtp 25&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no fixup protocol sqlnet 1521&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fixup protocol tftp 69&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;names&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list compiled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list massey permit udp any host 192.168.101.14 eq snmp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list massey permit ip any any&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;pager lines 24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;logging on&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;logging timestamp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;logging console warnings&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;logging monitor warnings&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;logging buffered warnings&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;logging trap warnings&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;logging host inside 130.123.128.69&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;mtu massey 1500&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;mtu inside 1500&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip address massey 192.168.101.14 255.255.255.252&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip address inside 192.168.67.2 255.255.255.252&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip audit info action alarm&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip audit attack action alarm&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;pdm logging informational 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;pdm history enable&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;arp timeout 14400&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,massey) 130.123.224.0 130.123.224.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,massey) 210.55.12.10 210.55.12.10 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,massey) 210.55.12.11 210.55.12.11 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-group massey in interface massey&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route massey 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.101.13 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route inside 130.123.224.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.67.1 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route inside 210.55.12.10 255.255.255.255 192.168.67.1 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route inside 210.55.12.11 255.255.255.255 192.168.67.1 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;timeout xlate 3:00:00&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 rpc 0:10:00 h225 1:00:00&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;timeout h323 0:05:00 mgcp 0:05:00 sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;timeout uauth 0:05:00 absolute&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aaa-server radius-authport 1812&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aaa-server radius-acctport 1813&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aaa-server TACACS+ protocol tacacs+&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aaa-server TACACS+ max-failed-attempts 3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aaa-server TACACS+ deadtime 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aaa-server RADIUS protocol radius&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aaa-server RADIUS max-failed-attempts 3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aaa-server RADIUS deadtime 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aaa-server RADIUS (inside) host 130.123.225.71 CiscoRadiusServer timeout 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aaa-server RADIUS (inside) host 130.123.128.32 CiscoRadiusServer timeout 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aaa-server LOCAL protocol local&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;snmp-server host inside 130.123.128.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;snmp-server location ALB QBA B10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;snmp-server contact ITS - ISS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;snmp-server community public&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;snmp-server enable traps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;floodguard enable&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sysopt connection permit-pptp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sysopt noproxyarp massey&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sysopt noproxyarp inside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;telnet 130.x.x.x.255.0.0 inside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;telnet 130.x.x.x.255.255.255 inside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;telnet timeout 5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ssh timeout 5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;console timeout 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;dhcpd lease 3600&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;dhcpd ping_timeout 750&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;terminal width 80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cryptochecksum:xxxx&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;: end&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2005 02:10:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/problems-with-an-internal-internal-pix-deployment/m-p/389793#M542490</guid>
      <dc:creator>geustace</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-01-17T02:10:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems with an internal - internal PIX deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/problems-with-an-internal-internal-pix-deployment/m-p/389794#M542492</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By looking at config:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;snmp-server host inside 130.123.128.2 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IP address  130.123.128.2 of the host allowed to poll&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!--- and where to send traps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so you need to added below nat 0 statement:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 0 130.123.128.2 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or nat (inside) 0 130.123.128.0 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let me know if you have any questions.,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MD&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2005 03:08:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/problems-with-an-internal-internal-pix-deployment/m-p/389794#M542492</guid>
      <dc:creator>msdesai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-01-17T03:08:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems with an internal - internal PIX deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/problems-with-an-internal-internal-pix-deployment/m-p/389795#M542493</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Most of the 130.123 network is on the 'massey' side. Only 130.123.224/24 is on the inside. I don't want to use NAT and have tried&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but that doesn't seem to make any difference.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From 130.123.128.1 I can ping 192.168.101.14 and get a reply but when 130.123.128.1 sends snmp packets, the pix receives them but doesn't reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NB: We have multiple servers running SNMP, 130.123.128.2 is the primary trap receiver.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:16:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/problems-with-an-internal-internal-pix-deployment/m-p/389795#M542493</guid>
      <dc:creator>geustace</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-01-17T19:16:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems with an internal - internal PIX deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/problems-with-an-internal-internal-pix-deployment/m-p/389796#M542495</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In order for you to use 130.123.128.1 or 130.123.128.2, you need to added below Statements:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;snmp-server host outside  130.123.128.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;snmp-server host outside  130.123.128.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MD&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2005 21:06:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/problems-with-an-internal-internal-pix-deployment/m-p/389796#M542495</guid>
      <dc:creator>msdesai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-01-17T21:06:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems with an internal - internal PIX deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/problems-with-an-internal-internal-pix-deployment/m-p/389797#M542498</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In order for you to use 130.123.128.1 or 130.123.128.2, you need to added below Statements:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;snmp-server host massey  130.123.128.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;snmp-server host massey 130.123.128.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MD&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2005 21:06:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/problems-with-an-internal-internal-pix-deployment/m-p/389797#M542498</guid>
      <dc:creator>msdesai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-01-17T21:06:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems with an internal - internal PIX deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/problems-with-an-internal-internal-pix-deployment/m-p/389798#M542499</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;snmp-server has no impact on 130.123.128.1 as it is polling, it isn't being sent traps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But the issue is why does tftp not work but ping does ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have heard that there are a bunch of implicit rules associated with a sec0 interface and that may been the cause e.g. no telnet unless over ipsec.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:34:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/problems-with-an-internal-internal-pix-deployment/m-p/389798#M542499</guid>
      <dc:creator>geustace</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-01-18T00:34:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems with an internal - internal PIX deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/problems-with-an-internal-internal-pix-deployment/m-p/389799#M542500</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The biggest hurdle has been crossed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By adding tftp-server massey a.b.c.d xxxx&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can now get at any tftp server on the massey side.  That achieved I have uploaded various ACLs which seem to have now got most things working the way I want.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My conclusion has been that a PIX is probably not the best solution for an internal deployment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 21:01:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/problems-with-an-internal-internal-pix-deployment/m-p/389799#M542500</guid>
      <dc:creator>geustace</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-01-18T21:01:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

