<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Patch for alert 1203/0 IP Fragment Overwrite in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/patch-for-alert-1203-0-ip-fragment-overwrite/m-p/2052587#M54535</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Dear wsulym,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your feedback. Actually the windows that using is windows XP as well and they are detected alert 1203/0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is why i was finding patch for the windows XP. Is there any other solution for this problem?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 02:51:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>vijendran.packiam</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-10-19T02:51:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Patch for alert 1203/0 IP Fragment Overwrite</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/patch-for-alert-1203-0-ip-fragment-overwrite/m-p/2052585#M54530</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I was unable to find the patches for the alert 1203/0 IP Fragment Overwrite.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When i go to the site "Microsoft IP Fragment Reassembly Patches".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was unable to find patch for the Windows XP. If i go to the Windows NT4.0 Workstation i found out that the page cannot be found as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need patch for Windows XP fof alert 1203/0 IP fragment Overwrite.Kindly assist on this please anyone.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 12:48:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/patch-for-alert-1203-0-ip-fragment-overwrite/m-p/2052585#M54530</guid>
      <dc:creator>vijendran.packiam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T12:48:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Patch for alert 1203/0 IP Fragment Overwrite</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/patch-for-alert-1203-0-ip-fragment-overwrite/m-p/2052586#M54533</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You don't see a windows XP patch because the vulnerability pre-dates XP's ship. If memory serves me correct (and a quick search showed nothing to the contrary), XP was not affected.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:26:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/patch-for-alert-1203-0-ip-fragment-overwrite/m-p/2052586#M54533</guid>
      <dc:creator>wsulym</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-16T17:26:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Patch for alert 1203/0 IP Fragment Overwrite</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/patch-for-alert-1203-0-ip-fragment-overwrite/m-p/2052587#M54535</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Dear wsulym,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your feedback. Actually the windows that using is windows XP as well and they are detected alert 1203/0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is why i was finding patch for the windows XP. Is there any other solution for this problem?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 02:51:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/patch-for-alert-1203-0-ip-fragment-overwrite/m-p/2052587#M54535</guid>
      <dc:creator>vijendran.packiam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-19T02:51:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Patch for alert 1203/0 IP Fragment Overwrite</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/patch-for-alert-1203-0-ip-fragment-overwrite/m-p/2052588#M54539</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Perhaps I don;t understand what you are asking.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you seeing alerts generated with a destination address of a Windows XP workstation?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 14:00:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/patch-for-alert-1203-0-ip-fragment-overwrite/m-p/2052588#M54539</guid>
      <dc:creator>wsulym</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-19T14:00:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Patch for alert 1203/0 IP Fragment Overwrite</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/patch-for-alert-1203-0-ip-fragment-overwrite/m-p/2052589#M54542</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear wsulym,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Actually source and destination is Windows XP workstation. Thats why i was wondering how come 1203/0 alert is detected in WIndows XP workstation and when i find the patch for this alert it show page requested cannot found.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kindly advice please.Thanks...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 08:39:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/patch-for-alert-1203-0-ip-fragment-overwrite/m-p/2052589#M54542</guid>
      <dc:creator>vijendran.packiam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-22T08:39:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Patch for alert 1203/0 IP Fragment Overwrite</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/patch-for-alert-1203-0-ip-fragment-overwrite/m-p/2052590#M54544</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The signature fires because traffic matching what it detects is seen.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The vulnerability was disclosed prior to winXP releasing, winXP is not vulnerable to this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why 2 winXP endpoints are sending traffic that triggers the signature - don't know - we'd have to look at the traffic that is being passed and match that to the alert that's firing. If you feel that this there is a false positive, I ask that you capture traffic and provide the alert that fires during that capture and either open a TAC case, or submit it here:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/ipshome.x?i=12&amp;amp;shortna=ContactUS#ContactUS"&gt;http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/ipshome.x?i=12&amp;amp;shortna=ContactUS#ContactUS&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:07:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/patch-for-alert-1203-0-ip-fragment-overwrite/m-p/2052590#M54544</guid>
      <dc:creator>wsulym</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-22T15:07:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

