<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ASA PBR, Encryption Domain (And NAT) in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-pbr-encryption-domain-and-nat/m-p/3926196#M5490</link>
    <description>In Short...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What I am not sure of is will my server still match the encryption domain when PBR'd out the interface with the cryptomap attached or does the use of a PBR cause it to bypass the crypto somehow?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;YES&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 11:50:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bhargavdesai</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-09-18T11:50:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA PBR, Encryption Domain (And NAT)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-pbr-encryption-domain-and-nat/m-p/3926156#M5488</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm after some advice on the attached setup and wondering about the ASA order of Operations here along with PBR/Encryption. I'm comfortable with the VPN itself and PBR etc. This is more to see if anyone has a better understanding of how the PBR and Crypto work together.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have ASA with 3 interfaces, Server hanging off Interface 3. Two goals I am looking to achieve are on there.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know I can create a PBR and attach to Interface 3 which will achieve the 2 routing goals however I am not sure if when my PBR sends traffic to a next hop out Interface 2 that it be encrypted.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My understanding is the following -&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PBR will be matching on real IP address of server (192.168.10.10).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Encryption domain will match my NAT'd address of 10.99.0.10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I am not sure of is will my server still match the encryption domain when PBR'd out the interface with the cryptomap attached or does the use of a PBR cause it to bypass the crypto somehow?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In an ideal world I would use route based VPN but not possible for this one.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 17:30:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-pbr-encryption-domain-and-nat/m-p/3926156#M5488</guid>
      <dc:creator>GRANT3779</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T17:30:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA PBR, Encryption Domain (And NAT)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-pbr-encryption-domain-and-nat/m-p/3926194#M5489</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As per my knowledge,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ASA order of operation for your scenario would be ROUTE (PBR) &amp;gt; NAT &amp;gt; VPN&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So your setup will work. You have to configure all the component correctly like PBR, ROUTE, NAT, and Crypto ACL etc.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 11:49:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-pbr-encryption-domain-and-nat/m-p/3926194#M5489</guid>
      <dc:creator>bhargavdesai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-18T11:49:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA PBR, Encryption Domain (And NAT)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-pbr-encryption-domain-and-nat/m-p/3926196#M5490</link>
      <description>In Short...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What I am not sure of is will my server still match the encryption domain when PBR'd out the interface with the cryptomap attached or does the use of a PBR cause it to bypass the crypto somehow?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;YES&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 11:50:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-pbr-encryption-domain-and-nat/m-p/3926196#M5490</guid>
      <dc:creator>bhargavdesai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-18T11:50:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

