<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Pix vs Cisco IOS Firewall in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-vs-cisco-ios-firewall/m-p/332795#M549414</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;What are advantages using Pix Appliance instead of Cisco IOS Firewall.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:04:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>concurrent</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T08:04:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Pix vs Cisco IOS Firewall</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-vs-cisco-ios-firewall/m-p/332795#M549414</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What are advantages using Pix Appliance instead of Cisco IOS Firewall.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:04:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-vs-cisco-ios-firewall/m-p/332795#M549414</guid>
      <dc:creator>concurrent</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T08:04:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pix vs Cisco IOS Firewall</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-vs-cisco-ios-firewall/m-p/332796#M549416</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The difference is that a PIX was designed ground-up to be a firewall and uses an Adaptive Security Algorithm as well as layer 4 inspection "fixup". &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IOS with CBAC/firewall "features" is a souped up router with added features such as stateful inspection (layer 3 only). For a small spot implementation, this might be adequate, but for an application where security is paramount, a 'defense in depth' strategy calls for both the screening access router (not necessarly with CBAC/FW feature set, but perhaps the IDS features), and a firewall.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if u like rate for this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2005 19:27:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-vs-cisco-ios-firewall/m-p/332796#M549416</guid>
      <dc:creator>panlamture</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-14T19:27:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

