<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX ver7 &amp; Trunk in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-ver7-trunk/m-p/393782#M549674</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you enable PIX in bridged mode, PIX will be totally transparent between the connection of 3550 and the 6509.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The "trunk" is a terminology from cisco propriatery "isl". dot1q does not have the trunk or not trunk meaning (is just tagged and untagged traffic).  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2005 06:53:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pavlosd</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-04-10T06:53:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX ver7 &amp; Trunk</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-ver7-trunk/m-p/393780#M549672</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm back again with same question I posted few weeks ago, pplz told me to hold on to it till ver 7 comes out, as it's out now, so ques again is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;6509's is attached to 3550xl via trunk (dot1q),&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; carryi'n all of our vlan (35+ vlans) to outside network, I need to drop pix in b/w 6509 and 3550 and make trunk in /out side. so that all the traffic&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;will go out as it is goi'n right now.(bump in wire scenario, just like stealth firewall)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I looked up in Version 7, but couldnt find anyway to make trunk b/w PIX and other side. May be I'm wrong, but Can Anyone please help me out in this probe.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;your reply will b "highly appericated"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SMA&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:03:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-ver7-trunk/m-p/393780#M549672</guid>
      <dc:creator>shariqashfaq</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T08:03:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX ver7 &amp; Trunk</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-ver7-trunk/m-p/393781#M549673</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;As far as I know, this cannot be implemented in practice...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:58:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-ver7-trunk/m-p/393781#M549673</guid>
      <dc:creator>umedryk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-08T13:58:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX ver7 &amp; Trunk</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-ver7-trunk/m-p/393782#M549674</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you enable PIX in bridged mode, PIX will be totally transparent between the connection of 3550 and the 6509.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The "trunk" is a terminology from cisco propriatery "isl". dot1q does not have the trunk or not trunk meaning (is just tagged and untagged traffic).  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2005 06:53:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-ver7-trunk/m-p/393782#M549674</guid>
      <dc:creator>pavlosd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-10T06:53:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

