<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Replacing a PIX 520 in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/replacing-a-pix-520/m-p/356637#M551060</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the quick response.  This is very helpful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rob.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 18:16:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rob.wright</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-02-25T18:16:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Replacing a PIX 520</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/replacing-a-pix-520/m-p/356634#M551054</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, I have a client that has an PIX 520 which requires an upgrade to a more current unit.  I have looked at the literature on this site and have determined the PIX525 will do the job.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only issue I have is that the PIX520 uses a connection based license for concurrent connections.  Is this licensing gone now?  How many concurrent xlated sessions can the 525 handle?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help or links would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:58:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/replacing-a-pix-520/m-p/356634#M551054</guid>
      <dc:creator>rob.wright</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T07:58:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Replacing a PIX 520</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/replacing-a-pix-520/m-p/356635#M551055</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rob,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As per 525 documentation :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PERFORMANCE SUMMARY&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;#149; Cleartext throughput: Up to 330 Mbps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;#149; Concurrent connections: 280,000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;#149; 168-bit 3DES IPSec VPN throughput: Up to 145 Mbps with VAC+ or 72 Mbps with VAC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;#149; 128-bit AES IPSec VPN throughput: Up to 135 Mbps with VAC+&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;#149; 256-bit AES IPSec VPN throughput: Up to 135 Mbps with VAC+&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;#149; Simultaneous VPN tunnels: 2000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;More Info:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_data_sheet09186a0080091b09.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_data_sheet09186a0080091b09.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jay&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:03:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/replacing-a-pix-520/m-p/356635#M551055</guid>
      <dc:creator>jmia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-25T16:03:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Replacing a PIX 520</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/replacing-a-pix-520/m-p/356636#M551057</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just to add to this, there is no concept of a connection based license in the PIX anymore.  PIX's are licensed now based on either a Restricted, Unrestricted, or Failover license now.  These licenses really equate to number of interfaces supported per platform, etc...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:05:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/replacing-a-pix-520/m-p/356636#M551057</guid>
      <dc:creator>scoclayton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-25T17:05:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Replacing a PIX 520</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/replacing-a-pix-520/m-p/356637#M551060</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the quick response.  This is very helpful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rob.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 18:16:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/replacing-a-pix-520/m-p/356637#M551060</guid>
      <dc:creator>rob.wright</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-25T18:16:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

