<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX LAN Based Failover and Crossover cables in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-lan-based-failover-and-crossover-cables/m-p/376792#M551804</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Iftikhar,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good question, I cant seem to find a reference to anything other than "Do not use a Xover cable to do LAN based failover".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would say this is only a recommendation or best practice. It should definitely work with a cross over cable. The idea behind the introduction of LAN based failover is due the distance limitation of the failover serial cable. If the units are atleast 100 m apart (say) then you cannot use the serial cable. So LAN based failover was introduced. Now I wouldnt recommend to use a cross over cable that long to connect between the two devices. Connecting through a hub or a switch helps in better reproduction of voltage levels on the line compared to connecting a cross over cable. This will probably help in better detection of link failures.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So my conclusion is that cross over cable should work with LAN based failover, just that its a best practice to use a switch or hub.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2005 20:26:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>thisisshanky</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-02-05T20:26:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX LAN Based Failover and Crossover cables</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-lan-based-failover-and-crossover-cables/m-p/376791#M551803</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is recommended on following URL that crossover cable should not be used for PIX LAN based failovers. Does anybody know what is the rationale behind this recommendation and why a switched connection is recommended between Pri and Stby PIX firewalls for Failover interfaces&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_tech_note09186a0080094ea7.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_tech_note09186a0080094ea7.shtml&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Iftikhar&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:55:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-lan-based-failover-and-crossover-cables/m-p/376791#M551803</guid>
      <dc:creator>iftikhar.qurashi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T07:55:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX LAN Based Failover and Crossover cables</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-lan-based-failover-and-crossover-cables/m-p/376792#M551804</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Iftikhar,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good question, I cant seem to find a reference to anything other than "Do not use a Xover cable to do LAN based failover".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would say this is only a recommendation or best practice. It should definitely work with a cross over cable. The idea behind the introduction of LAN based failover is due the distance limitation of the failover serial cable. If the units are atleast 100 m apart (say) then you cannot use the serial cable. So LAN based failover was introduced. Now I wouldnt recommend to use a cross over cable that long to connect between the two devices. Connecting through a hub or a switch helps in better reproduction of voltage levels on the line compared to connecting a cross over cable. This will probably help in better detection of link failures.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So my conclusion is that cross over cable should work with LAN based failover, just that its a best practice to use a switch or hub.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2005 20:26:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-lan-based-failover-and-crossover-cables/m-p/376792#M551804</guid>
      <dc:creator>thisisshanky</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-05T20:26:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX LAN Based Failover and Crossover cables</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-lan-based-failover-and-crossover-cables/m-p/376793#M551806</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, I have been using a crossover's for the past several years on the 525 without any problem. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2005 01:12:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-lan-based-failover-and-crossover-cables/m-p/376793#M551806</guid>
      <dc:creator>griffijo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-06T01:12:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

