<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Failover routes on a PIX in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-routes-on-a-pix/m-p/369533#M551868</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;totally agree with daniel.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the required backup scenario is not going to work, due to the limitation of the current pix os. (i.e. pix does  NOT redirect traffic on the same interface)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2005 00:38:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jackko</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-02-04T00:38:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Failover routes on a PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-routes-on-a-pix/m-p/369529#M551859</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Have a question about routing with a PIX.  I have 4 branches with all PIX 515E's.  This is in full mesh VPN topology.  My question is, can I add a failover route through another branch if one link fails?  I'm curious if i'm going to have to enable OSPF for this or not.  Any help is appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:54:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-routes-on-a-pix/m-p/369529#M551859</guid>
      <dc:creator>jhaggett</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T07:54:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failover routes on a PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-routes-on-a-pix/m-p/369530#M551861</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think that failover would work by using OSPF or by doing static routes w/higher metric's.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But since you are doing backup routing over VPN connections I think that the back up route network/s would have to be included in your crypto access-lists for each VPN that will back up the route.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does that make sense.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Daniel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 18:41:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-routes-on-a-pix/m-p/369530#M551861</guid>
      <dc:creator>dbellaze</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-03T18:41:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failover routes on a PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-routes-on-a-pix/m-p/369531#M551864</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry actually you cannot do this right now. You can't redirect traffic on the same interface. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think this is a limitation that the 7.0 release will no longer have which is due for release in the next few months.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Daniel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 18:45:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-routes-on-a-pix/m-p/369531#M551864</guid>
      <dc:creator>dbellaze</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-03T18:45:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failover routes on a PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-routes-on-a-pix/m-p/369532#M551866</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hello&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;its better you enable ospf for your setup.. dynamic routing is the only solution as of now, if you think of backup solutions.. on a pix you cannot add higher metric routes..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so, enable ospf and make ur life easier.. assign costs and you can manipulate ur routes...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hope this helps.. all the best..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Raj&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:19:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-routes-on-a-pix/m-p/369532#M551866</guid>
      <dc:creator>sachinraja</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-03T21:19:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failover routes on a PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-routes-on-a-pix/m-p/369533#M551868</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;totally agree with daniel.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the required backup scenario is not going to work, due to the limitation of the current pix os. (i.e. pix does  NOT redirect traffic on the same interface)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2005 00:38:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-routes-on-a-pix/m-p/369533#M551868</guid>
      <dc:creator>jackko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-04T00:38:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

