<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX 515e lost mate (failover) in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-515e-lost-mate-failover/m-p/376194#M552852</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I ran both sides through the TAC Output Interperter.  The standby has a small number of CRCs on the outside interface (0% which is great than 0.1%)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 19:58:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jason.aarons</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-01-12T19:58:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX 515e lost mate (failover)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-515e-lost-mate-failover/m-p/376193#M552851</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Which interface is interface 0? Ethernet0?  This is my outside interface.  Why would my outside interface being communicating with the other pix, when I have a dedicated failover interface with x-over cable?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jan 12 02:06:26 lab-pix515e-pix1.com Jan 12 2005 03:06:25: %PIX-1-10300&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5: (Primary) Other firewall reporting failure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jan 12 04:48:49 lab-pix515e-pix2.com Jan 12 2005 05:48:48: %PIX-1-10500&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5: (Secondary) Lost Failover communications with mate on interface 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover ip address outside 201.196.63.37&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover ip address inside 10.202.254.29&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover ip address failover 10.202.254.34&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover link failover&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover lan unit primary&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover lan interface failover&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover lan key ********&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover lan enable&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:51:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-515e-lost-mate-failover/m-p/376193#M552851</guid>
      <dc:creator>jason.aarons</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T07:51:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX 515e lost mate (failover)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-515e-lost-mate-failover/m-p/376194#M552852</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I ran both sides through the TAC Output Interperter.  The standby has a small number of CRCs on the outside interface (0% which is great than 0.1%)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 19:58:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-515e-lost-mate-failover/m-p/376194#M552852</guid>
      <dc:creator>jason.aarons</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-01-12T19:58:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

