<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PIX Nat Zero vs Global PAT in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat-zero-vs-global-pat/m-p/396128#M553678</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Will PC 10.16.232.11 get the global pat going outbound (10.16.8.247) or the static (10.16.9.101)?  I need it to get the static.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should I add a "nat 0" for 10.16.232.11?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (outside) 1 10.16.8.247&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 10.16.9.101 10.16.232.122 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PIX 6.3(1)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:48:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jason.aarons</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T07:48:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX Nat Zero vs Global PAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat-zero-vs-global-pat/m-p/396128#M553678</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Will PC 10.16.232.11 get the global pat going outbound (10.16.8.247) or the static (10.16.9.101)?  I need it to get the static.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should I add a "nat 0" for 10.16.232.11?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (outside) 1 10.16.8.247&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 10.16.9.101 10.16.232.122 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PIX 6.3(1)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:48:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat-zero-vs-global-pat/m-p/396128#M553678</guid>
      <dc:creator>jason.aarons</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T07:48:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX Nat Zero vs Global PAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat-zero-vs-global-pat/m-p/396129#M553679</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Typo, the pc is actually 10.16.232.122, the nat 0 would be for 10.16.232.122&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2004 22:40:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat-zero-vs-global-pat/m-p/396129#M553679</guid>
      <dc:creator>jason.aarons</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-12-17T22:40:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX Nat Zero vs Global PAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat-zero-vs-global-pat/m-p/396130#M553681</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;A static command has a higher priority than a nat (intf) 1 command.  So, yes...the 10.16.232.122 host will be translated via the static.  Make sure you issue a 'cl xlate' after adding the static to clear out any existing translations the PC may already have.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2004 02:17:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat-zero-vs-global-pat/m-p/396130#M553681</guid>
      <dc:creator>scoclayton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-12-18T02:17:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

