<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PIX + tcp handshake debug in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-tcp-handshake-debug/m-p/374432#M554923</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have  an application running between 2 custom proxy servers  with a PIX&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;between them. The application runs fine  when both proxys are on the same &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;lan.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It stops working when we insert the PIX.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Access-group allows everything , inside device is translated on the outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 172.20.0.95 172.20.0.95 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When we put a debug packet  we can see ;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1***172.20.0.95   SYN   to  172.19.8.146 on the inside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2***PIX forwarding the 172.20.0.95   SYN   to  172.19.8.146 on the outside &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(using its own sequence number)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3***172.19.8.146  SYNACK to 172.20.0.95 on the outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4***PIX forwarding the 172.19.8.146  SYNACK to 172.20.0.95 on the inside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5***172.20.0.95   ACK   to  172.19.8.146&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;6****  But we don't see the PIX forwarding the last ACK on the outside .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We suspect that it is dropped by the PIX  intrusion-protection  mechanism.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anyone tell me if they see something wrong with the last packet , &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;explaining why it is dropped ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And can this be bypassed through some PIX tweaking  ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;see debug packet trace in attachment&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:44:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>michelcaissie</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T07:44:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX + tcp handshake debug</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-tcp-handshake-debug/m-p/374432#M554923</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have  an application running between 2 custom proxy servers  with a PIX&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;between them. The application runs fine  when both proxys are on the same &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;lan.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It stops working when we insert the PIX.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Access-group allows everything , inside device is translated on the outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 172.20.0.95 172.20.0.95 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When we put a debug packet  we can see ;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1***172.20.0.95   SYN   to  172.19.8.146 on the inside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2***PIX forwarding the 172.20.0.95   SYN   to  172.19.8.146 on the outside &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(using its own sequence number)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3***172.19.8.146  SYNACK to 172.20.0.95 on the outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4***PIX forwarding the 172.19.8.146  SYNACK to 172.20.0.95 on the inside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5***172.20.0.95   ACK   to  172.19.8.146&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;6****  But we don't see the PIX forwarding the last ACK on the outside .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We suspect that it is dropped by the PIX  intrusion-protection  mechanism.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anyone tell me if they see something wrong with the last packet , &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;explaining why it is dropped ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And can this be bypassed through some PIX tweaking  ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;see debug packet trace in attachment&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:44:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-tcp-handshake-debug/m-p/374432#M554923</guid>
      <dc:creator>michelcaissie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T07:44:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX + tcp handshake debug</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-tcp-handshake-debug/m-p/374433#M554924</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Try issuing a 'debug fixup tcp' on the PIX and attempting the connection again.  If the PIX is dropping the packets as a result of the ASA, this debug will tell you why.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One other note, I would HIGHLY suggest using the capture utility on the PIX as opposed to the 'debug packet' unless you really get a kick out of doing hex conversions all day &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 17:46:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-tcp-handshake-debug/m-p/374433#M554924</guid>
      <dc:creator>scoclayton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-11-15T17:46:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

