<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PIX failover mechanism in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-mechanism/m-p/331012#M556660</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am deploying a pair of PIX directly connecting to a pair of firewalls managed by a 3rd party. My firewall pair is to provide for the necessary redundancy in case of failure in the master PIX. The connections between PIX and 3rd party's firewalls were point-to-point, i.e. master PIX to master firewall and standby PIX to standby firewall (See Scenario 1). However I was told that connecting in this way will cause failover mechanism to fail. To make the failover works I have to connect as per in Scenario 2. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Qn: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Is it true that I need to connect in scenario 2?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Just wondering how the PIX failover mechanism works? Is it by keepalive messages sending across the external-facing interfaces?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:40:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>leejoansin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T07:40:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX failover mechanism</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-mechanism/m-p/331012#M556660</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am deploying a pair of PIX directly connecting to a pair of firewalls managed by a 3rd party. My firewall pair is to provide for the necessary redundancy in case of failure in the master PIX. The connections between PIX and 3rd party's firewalls were point-to-point, i.e. master PIX to master firewall and standby PIX to standby firewall (See Scenario 1). However I was told that connecting in this way will cause failover mechanism to fail. To make the failover works I have to connect as per in Scenario 2. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Qn: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Is it true that I need to connect in scenario 2?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Just wondering how the PIX failover mechanism works? Is it by keepalive messages sending across the external-facing interfaces?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:40:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-mechanism/m-p/331012#M556660</guid>
      <dc:creator>leejoansin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T07:40:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX failover mechanism</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-mechanism/m-p/331013#M556662</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi hope this helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_installation_guide_chapter09186a00800eb0c4.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_installation_guide_chapter09186a00800eb0c4.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_tech_note09186a0080094ea7.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_tech_note09186a0080094ea7.shtml&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 13:10:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-mechanism/m-p/331013#M556662</guid>
      <dc:creator>Endwigast</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-10-06T13:10:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX failover mechanism</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-mechanism/m-p/331014#M556666</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scenario two is the correct way. The reason being that the PIX firewalls in a failover configuration send failover hello packets on all interfaces and if an interface does not detect two consecutive hello packets in a specific time interval the interface enters testing mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 17:19:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-mechanism/m-p/331014#M556666</guid>
      <dc:creator>a.awan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-10-06T17:19:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX failover mechanism</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-mechanism/m-p/331015#M556667</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you! It helps a lot! &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 23:46:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover-mechanism/m-p/331015#M556667</guid>
      <dc:creator>leejoansin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-10-06T23:46:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

