<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Telnet from PIX in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/telnet-from-pix/m-p/323115#M556750</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I was very suprised to find that i can't use telnet command from PIX device? Why this functionality is absent?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:39:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rmv72</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T07:39:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Telnet from PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/telnet-from-pix/m-p/323115#M556750</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I was very suprised to find that i can't use telnet command from PIX device? Why this functionality is absent?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:39:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/telnet-from-pix/m-p/323115#M556750</guid>
      <dc:creator>rmv72</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T07:39:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Telnet from PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/telnet-from-pix/m-p/323116#M556753</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why would the functionality be there?  Wouldn't it seem ironic to be launching an easily snooped, clear-text connection to another device on your network from your "security device"?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2004 13:56:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/telnet-from-pix/m-p/323116#M556753</guid>
      <dc:creator>scoclayton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-10-04T13:56:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Telnet from PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/telnet-from-pix/m-p/323117#M556754</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;OK, I'll bite:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Because it's convenient to be able to probe tcp ports and grab banners, etc. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. If security is the reason, why not SSH then?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. Because sometimes telnet is OK. Wouldn't it make sense to let the user (firewall admin in this case) make that decision?  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Simon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2004 14:40:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/telnet-from-pix/m-p/323117#M556754</guid>
      <dc:creator>simonrak2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-10-04T14:40:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Telnet from PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/telnet-from-pix/m-p/323118#M556756</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;More lines of code = less secure code&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2004 16:09:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/telnet-from-pix/m-p/323118#M556756</guid>
      <dc:creator>Solace</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-10-04T16:09:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Telnet from PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/telnet-from-pix/m-p/323119#M556758</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I submitted an enhancement request to the Pix team for a customer maybe a year ago for this feature(telnet from pix), along with traceroute and scheduled reloads.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Only scheduled reloads appear to make it in the next major release.  This is most likely due to the reasons the others have mentioned.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;peter&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2004 19:31:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/telnet-from-pix/m-p/323119#M556758</guid>
      <dc:creator>pcomeaux</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-10-05T19:31:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

