<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic idsm , fwsm in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/idsm-fwsm/m-p/1715611#M558010</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have the following senario ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cisco 6509 is connected to internet we need to secure our internal LAN segments .with IDSM and FWSM moudules.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;internet ------&amp;gt;IDSM------&amp;gt;FWSM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;plz suggest&amp;nbsp; some confiugration links for IDSM , FWSM&amp;nbsp; configuration&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;also suggest best practises we plan to keep IDSM IN proimiscouss mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 20:20:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mirehteshamali</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T20:20:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>idsm , fwsm</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/idsm-fwsm/m-p/1715611#M558010</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have the following senario ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cisco 6509 is connected to internet we need to secure our internal LAN segments .with IDSM and FWSM moudules.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;internet ------&amp;gt;IDSM------&amp;gt;FWSM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;plz suggest&amp;nbsp; some confiugration links for IDSM , FWSM&amp;nbsp; configuration&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;also suggest best practises we plan to keep IDSM IN proimiscouss mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 20:20:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/idsm-fwsm/m-p/1715611#M558010</guid>
      <dc:creator>mirehteshamali</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T20:20:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: idsm , fwsm</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/idsm-fwsm/m-p/1715612#M558011</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;First of all please note that the design you're suggesting is not the best.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IDSM does more in-depth packet analsysis and thus has a lower performance cap (500Mbit/s as opposed to &lt;EM&gt;theoretical&lt;/EM&gt; 5Mbit/s for FWSM). In real life what I would suggest to do is put the IDSM in promiscous mode for vlan(s) behind FWSM and not in front.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With IDSM in promiscous mode there is no interaction between the modules and they can be configured separately according to configuration guides and depending on versions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For reference:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ips/7.0/configuration/guide/cli/cli_idsm2.html"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ips/7.0/configuration/guide/cli/cli_idsm2.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/fwsm/fwsm40/configuration/guide/fwsm_cfg.html"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/fwsm/fwsm40/configuration/guide/fwsm_cfg.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marcin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 06:44:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/idsm-fwsm/m-p/1715612#M558011</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marcin Latosiewicz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-13T06:44:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: idsm , fwsm</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/idsm-fwsm/m-p/1715613#M558012</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;just wanted to know the following&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what is default password for idsm2 and fwsm&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i guess their&amp;nbsp; is no default password for fwsm&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;also let me know how do we log on tho IDSM&amp;nbsp; or fwsm ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;do the modules have seprate console ports ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or do we need to first connect to 6500 and then issue session command to move to IDSM ? fwsm ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;further where is console port on 6500 loacsted on supervisor engine ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 08:53:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/idsm-fwsm/m-p/1715613#M558012</guid>
      <dc:creator>mirehteshamali</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-13T08:53:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: idsm , fwsm</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/idsm-fwsm/m-p/1715614#M558014</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As for default username and password it's the same as anywehere - cisco.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you have a look at the documents I sent you? There an instruction on how to configure and how to get to those devices. You use the chassis or SSH/telnet/HTTPS directly once basic configuration is done.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FWSM has a physical console port but it's ON the blade (not on the front panel).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The console port doesn't have to be in uniform place accross different supervisors, it is always however labeled "console" (at least on blades from last 4-5 years) &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marcin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 09:08:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/idsm-fwsm/m-p/1715614#M558014</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marcin Latosiewicz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-13T09:08:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

