<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Cisco ASA sub-interfaces in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-sub-interfaces/m-p/1663580#M561267</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Problem: We are getting multiple reports of slowness to our DMZ and from there out to the internet.&amp;nbsp; I want to make sure that our DMZ is configured per best practice.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have an ASA configured with 5 sub-interfaces on our DMZ segment.&amp;nbsp; By default the ASA will use the same MAC address for all 5 subnets.&amp;nbsp; Should we configure a different virtual MAC address for each sub-interface?&amp;nbsp; Are there any known issues with the sub-interfaces sharing the same MAC address.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 20:42:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kirkulees007</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T20:42:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco ASA sub-interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-sub-interfaces/m-p/1663580#M561267</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Problem: We are getting multiple reports of slowness to our DMZ and from there out to the internet.&amp;nbsp; I want to make sure that our DMZ is configured per best practice.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have an ASA configured with 5 sub-interfaces on our DMZ segment.&amp;nbsp; By default the ASA will use the same MAC address for all 5 subnets.&amp;nbsp; Should we configure a different virtual MAC address for each sub-interface?&amp;nbsp; Are there any known issues with the sub-interfaces sharing the same MAC address.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 20:42:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-sub-interfaces/m-p/1663580#M561267</guid>
      <dc:creator>kirkulees007</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T20:42:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco ASA sub-interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-sub-interfaces/m-p/1663581#M561271</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, there is no issue with ASA interfaces configured in sub-interfaces.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, since it's a shared physical interface for 5 networks, I would check that the speed/duplex has been set correctly, and also if there is any errors on the interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Typically if the interface is overloaded because it's been shared by 5 different interfaces, slowness might be reported. So it's a good idea to check the interface counter.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also assume that all the LAN traffic between the sub-interfaces, as well as towards the Inside and Internet from those 5 networks also traverse through the ASA, so if there are lots of those traffic, it might impact on the speed as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 03:38:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-sub-interfaces/m-p/1663581#M561271</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-06T03:38:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

