<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PIX ARPing in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-arping/m-p/266208#M562986</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;when using normal NAT or static command,PIX works as&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the ARP Proxy for inside addresses.If I use nat 0 (either identity or exemption),proxy ARP does not work and you have to use routing.In the CISCO docu-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;mentation is the nat 0 identity considered as proxy ARPing able.Am I wrong ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                Thank you for your opinion&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                                Zdenek&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:34:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>zroth</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T07:34:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX ARPing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-arping/m-p/266208#M562986</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;when using normal NAT or static command,PIX works as&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the ARP Proxy for inside addresses.If I use nat 0 (either identity or exemption),proxy ARP does not work and you have to use routing.In the CISCO docu-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;mentation is the nat 0 identity considered as proxy ARPing able.Am I wrong ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                Thank you for your opinion&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                                Zdenek&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:34:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-arping/m-p/266208#M562986</guid>
      <dc:creator>zroth</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T07:34:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX ARPing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-arping/m-p/266209#M562987</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat 0 just disables the NAT at all, so i believe proxy arping gets disabled as you already observed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nadeem&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2004 15:25:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-arping/m-p/266209#M562987</guid>
      <dc:creator>nkhawaja</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-08-21T15:25:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

