<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Microsoft L2TP connection from behind PIX in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/microsoft-l2tp-connection-from-behind-pix/m-p/239804#M563241</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's been a while since I screwed around with L2TP but I recall that one of the biggest limitations to L2TP is that the original packets cannot be NAT'ed at all.  That is, not PAT'ed nor 1:1 NAT'ed.  The packets have to arrive at the termination device unchanged.  You may want to check into this and make sure my info is not outdated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:01:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>scoclayton</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-08-12T13:01:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Microsoft L2TP connection from behind PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/microsoft-l2tp-connection-from-behind-pix/m-p/239803#M563240</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to get a Microsoft native L2TP VPN client to go from behind my PIX to a VPN site on the Internet.  It doesn't work.  My PIX is running PAT for the outbound connections.  My client gets to the "Verifying username and password" stage and hangs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Suggestions?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:33:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/microsoft-l2tp-connection-from-behind-pix/m-p/239803#M563240</guid>
      <dc:creator>cboykin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T07:33:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Microsoft L2TP connection from behind PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/microsoft-l2tp-connection-from-behind-pix/m-p/239804#M563241</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's been a while since I screwed around with L2TP but I recall that one of the biggest limitations to L2TP is that the original packets cannot be NAT'ed at all.  That is, not PAT'ed nor 1:1 NAT'ed.  The packets have to arrive at the termination device unchanged.  You may want to check into this and make sure my info is not outdated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:01:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/microsoft-l2tp-connection-from-behind-pix/m-p/239804#M563241</guid>
      <dc:creator>scoclayton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-08-12T13:01:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Microsoft L2TP connection from behind PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/microsoft-l2tp-connection-from-behind-pix/m-p/239805#M563242</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;there is a ms update that provides some nat-t support to l2tp, but i have no idea how effective it is. i believe it is a separate download for win2k and xp, and is included in xp sp2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:39:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/microsoft-l2tp-connection-from-behind-pix/m-p/239805#M563242</guid>
      <dc:creator>mostiguy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-08-12T14:39:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

