<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Question on PIX failover... in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/question-on-pix-failover/m-p/217662#M563343</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am new to managing a particular network where I work and I discovered that the secondary PIX does not have a config when I do a "show conf".  The primary PIX is active and I see the config on it.  I want to copy the active config over to the secondary PIX, but I do not want "failover" to take place. I keep getting this console message stating that "failover cable connected but failover not enabled" or something similar to that.  How can I set up failover and copy the config over, but not have the primary PIX actually failover ?  Thanks for any help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:32:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rowleyt1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T07:32:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Question on PIX failover...</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/question-on-pix-failover/m-p/217662#M563343</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am new to managing a particular network where I work and I discovered that the secondary PIX does not have a config when I do a "show conf".  The primary PIX is active and I see the config on it.  I want to copy the active config over to the secondary PIX, but I do not want "failover" to take place. I keep getting this console message stating that "failover cable connected but failover not enabled" or something similar to that.  How can I set up failover and copy the config over, but not have the primary PIX actually failover ?  Thanks for any help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:32:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/question-on-pix-failover/m-p/217662#M563343</guid>
      <dc:creator>rowleyt1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T07:32:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question on PIX failover...</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/question-on-pix-failover/m-p/217663#M563344</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems like failover is disabled. the easiest approach is to type "failover on", this will enable the failover and the config will be replicated to secondary firewall.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nadeem&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 16:25:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/question-on-pix-failover/m-p/217663#M563344</guid>
      <dc:creator>nkhawaja</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-08-05T16:25:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question on PIX failover...</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/question-on-pix-failover/m-p/217664#M563345</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems like failover is disabled. the easiest approach is to type "failover on", this will enable the failover and the config will be replicated to secondary firewall.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nadeem&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 16:26:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/question-on-pix-failover/m-p/217664#M563345</guid>
      <dc:creator>nkhawaja</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-08-05T16:26:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

