<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic router acl vs pix acl in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/router-acl-vs-pix-acl/m-p/224870#M566958</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I was wondering if anyone could provide me with some inforamtion relevant to comparing router acls with pix acls.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I am splitting two internal private networks/subnets, and I want to protect them with ACL's, should I use a firewall with ACL's to do this (pix) or should I use a router with ACL's.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:19:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ccaron</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T07:19:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>router acl vs pix acl</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/router-acl-vs-pix-acl/m-p/224870#M566958</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I was wondering if anyone could provide me with some inforamtion relevant to comparing router acls with pix acls.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I am splitting two internal private networks/subnets, and I want to protect them with ACL's, should I use a firewall with ACL's to do this (pix) or should I use a router with ACL's.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:19:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/router-acl-vs-pix-acl/m-p/224870#M566958</guid>
      <dc:creator>ccaron</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T07:19:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: router acl vs pix acl</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/router-acl-vs-pix-acl/m-p/224871#M566983</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;router ACLs are not stateful, unless you are running the IOS firewall feature set. PIX ACLs are. non stateful ACLs are pretty limited in their functionality&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2004 19:53:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/router-acl-vs-pix-acl/m-p/224871#M566983</guid>
      <dc:creator>mostiguy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-04-01T19:53:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

