<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Trunk and PIX performance? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunk-and-pix-performance/m-p/301228#M569397</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you asking on the difference in performance when using a physical interface on the Pix vs a logical interface created using 802.1q?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2004 03:16:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>shannong</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-02-09T03:16:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Trunk and PIX performance?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunk-and-pix-performance/m-p/301225#M569394</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all together!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I consider two ways for PIX deployment with and without trunk mode usage on PIX ports.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know how influence trunk mode on throughput of PIX 525? Where does perform taging &amp;amp; untaging in CPU or NIC chip?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:12:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunk-and-pix-performance/m-p/301225#M569394</guid>
      <dc:creator>lysov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T07:12:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trunk and PIX performance?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunk-and-pix-performance/m-p/301226#M569395</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I guess influencing is not possible. Second question not clear&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:07:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunk-and-pix-performance/m-p/301226#M569395</guid>
      <dc:creator>sirpa_k</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-01-27T17:07:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trunk and PIX performance?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunk-and-pix-performance/m-p/301227#M569396</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I dont understand either of your questions. By influence throughput, do you mean QoS? The PIX is not yet capable of QoS but it is on the roadmap and I have been told it is not too far from release.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2004 03:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunk-and-pix-performance/m-p/301227#M569396</guid>
      <dc:creator>baileja</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-02-07T03:20:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trunk and PIX performance?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunk-and-pix-performance/m-p/301228#M569397</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you asking on the difference in performance when using a physical interface on the Pix vs a logical interface created using 802.1q?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2004 03:16:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunk-and-pix-performance/m-p/301228#M569397</guid>
      <dc:creator>shannong</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-02-09T03:16:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trunk and PIX performance?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunk-and-pix-performance/m-p/301229#M569398</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yep. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:23:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trunk-and-pix-performance/m-p/301229#M569398</guid>
      <dc:creator>lysov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-02-10T14:23:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

