<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic FWSM active-active config( Intra chassis) in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-active-active-config-intra-chassis/m-p/1506250#M579553</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is anybody is having configuration for same chasis acctive-active configuration( intra cheass) ?. I am going to install the 2 fwsm in the same chasis with active-active configuratuion. In cisco site only the inter chasis configuration is available.If anybody is having the config kindly send me the same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &amp;amp; Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R.MADHANKUMAR &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 19:13:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Madhan Kumar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T19:13:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FWSM active-active config( Intra chassis)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-active-active-config-intra-chassis/m-p/1506250#M579553</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is anybody is having configuration for same chasis acctive-active configuration( intra cheass) ?. I am going to install the 2 fwsm in the same chasis with active-active configuratuion. In cisco site only the inter chasis configuration is available.If anybody is having the config kindly send me the same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &amp;amp; Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R.MADHANKUMAR &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 19:13:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-active-active-config-intra-chassis/m-p/1506250#M579553</guid>
      <dc:creator>Madhan Kumar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T19:13:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FWSM active-active config( Intra chassis)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-active-active-config-intra-chassis/m-p/1506251#M579554</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Intra-chassis failover and inter-chassis failover - there is no difference in configuring them on FWSM-side. The FWSM is not aware if the peer device is in same or another chassis.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only difference on the chassis side is that you need to push same set of vlan-groups to both modules.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Active/active or active/standby configuration is differentitiated on FWSM. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marcin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 23:06:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-active-active-config-intra-chassis/m-p/1506251#M579554</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marcin Latosiewicz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-28T23:06:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FWSM active-active config( Intra chassis)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-active-active-config-intra-chassis/m-p/1506252#M579555</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #0000ff;"&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #0000ff;"&gt;Thanks for your reply. In intra chasis we are using the same MSFC, I mean the same router for uplinks for both modules, Whereas in inter chasis we are using different MSFC.&amp;nbsp; My doubt is we really require a HSRP config on the SVIs created for outside vlans on intra-chasis failover?.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #0000ff;"&gt;Thanks &amp;amp; Regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #0000ff;"&gt;R.MADHANKUMAR&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #0000ff;"&gt;India.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 05:53:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-active-active-config-intra-chassis/m-p/1506252#M579555</guid>
      <dc:creator>Madhan Kumar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-29T05:53:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FWSM active-active config( Intra chassis)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-active-active-config-intra-chassis/m-p/1506253#M579556</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear Marcin,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In inter-chasis failover we using different MSFC,I mean different routers, whereas in intra-chasis failover we are using the same MSFC. My doubt is we really require a HSRP config on the switch for outside SVIs?.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &amp;amp; Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R.MADHANKUMAR&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;India.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 06:01:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-active-active-config-intra-chassis/m-p/1506253#M579556</guid>
      <dc:creator>Madhan Kumar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-29T06:01:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FWSM active-active config( Intra chassis)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-active-active-config-intra-chassis/m-p/1506254#M579557</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Purely from FWSM's point of view HSRP is not required on the chassis in either of the scenarios, there is not problem to run traffic to a single SVI.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However one might think of a problem when for some reason L3 intreface becomes unavible on chassis 1 and usally this should be taken up by chassis 2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That being said, FWSM does not even require that L3 address is configured on the chassis, it can be configured on any other device, L2 adjacant of course.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The device was built to be agnostic of the operation of MSFC (except "firewall ..." configuration).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marcin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:00:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-active-active-config-intra-chassis/m-p/1506254#M579557</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marcin Latosiewicz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-29T09:00:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

