<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Overlapping nat rule problem in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596808#M587239</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes... Rule# 1 and Rule#3 also overlaps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reason why you can enter the command in before is probably you configure rule# 1 first, then you enter rule# 3. Eventhough it doesn't give you an error message of them being overlapping, they do overlap and it is not a supported configuration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So you remove rule# 3, then enter in rule# 2, and then reenter rule# 3, it will not give you any error message in regards to overlapping. In theory, it should give you the error, and it's probably a software bug that it doesn't give you the error message when it overlaps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In summary, you can't configure Rule# 3, if you are already using the same ip address for static PAT.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 10:40:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-12-21T10:40:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Overlapping nat rule problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596785#M587154</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The following is the nat rules for my asa5510&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (LAN,WAN) tcp PCCW_Pri_SMTP ftp LAN_MS02 ftp netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (LAN,WAN) tcp PCCW_Pri_SMTP ssh LAN_MS02 ssh netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (LAN,WAN) tcp PCCW_Pri_SMTP www LAN_MS02 www netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (LAN,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_SMTP 2525 LAN_MS02 smtp netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_Webmail https DMZ_MS01 https netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_SMTP ftp DMZ_MS01 ftp netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_SMTP ssh DMZ_MS01 ssh netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_SMTP 27 DMZ_MS01 27 netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Pri_SMTP smtp DMZ_IronPort_2 smtp netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_FTP ftp DMZ_FTP ftp netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_SMTP smtp DMZ_MS01 smtp netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (LAN,DMZ) 192.168.10.0 192.168.10.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 &lt;BR /&gt;static (DMZ,LAN) 172.16.0.0 172.16.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 &lt;BR /&gt;static (LAN,WAN) PCCW_Sec_SMTP LAN_MS02 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I tried to change the static rule "static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_SMTP smtp DMZ_MS01 smtp netmask 255.255.255.255 " to "static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_SMTP smtp DMZ_IronPort_2 smtp netmask 255.255.255.255". I got the overlapping of nat error. How do I fix it? Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 19:23:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596785#M587154</guid>
      <dc:creator>egthkaa20060417</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T19:23:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Overlapping nat rule problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596786#M587156</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This line that you would like to change to:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_SMTP smtp &lt;STRONG&gt;DMZ_IronPort_2&lt;/STRONG&gt; smtp netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;actually overlaps with the existing static NAT that you already have:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Pri_SMTP smtp &lt;STRONG&gt;DMZ_IronPort_2&lt;/STRONG&gt; smtp netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can't configure static PAT on the same ip address "DMZ_IronPort_2" on the same port (TCP/25). This is not supported.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:26:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596786#M587156</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-17T10:26:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Overlapping nat rule problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596787#M587160</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The ASA 8.3 supports multiple public addresses mapped to a single internal address. For example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;object service smtp&lt;BR /&gt; service tcp destination eq smtp&lt;BR /&gt;nat (WAN,DMZ) 1 source static any any destination static PCCW_Pri_SMTP DMZ_IronPort_2 service smtp smtp unidirectional&lt;BR /&gt;nat (WAN,DMZ) 2 source static any any destination static PCCW_Sec_SMTP DMZ_IronPort_2 service smtp smtp unidirectional&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You'd have to implement another rule to translate the outbound traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:57:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596787#M587160</guid>
      <dc:creator>Renato Morais</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-17T11:57:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Overlapping nat rule problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596788#M587162</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;even I changed to&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Pri_SMTP smtp &lt;STRONG&gt;DMZ_IronPort_1&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;smtp netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I overlapped another rule static (LAN,WAN) PCCW_Sec_SMTP LAN_MS02 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How to fix then?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 03:19:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596788#M587162</guid>
      <dc:creator>egthkaa20060417</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-18T03:19:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Overlapping nat rule problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596789#M587167</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;And you please share the ip address of those names.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Need to understand/know what the ip address is exactly for all those names. Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"sh run name" output would do. Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 03:35:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596789#M587167</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-18T03:35:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Overlapping nat rule problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596790#M587173</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is part of sh run output&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;asdm image disk0:/asdm521.bin&lt;BR /&gt;no asdm history enable&lt;BR /&gt;: Saved&lt;BR /&gt;:&lt;BR /&gt;ASA Version 7.2(1) &lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;hostname ciscoasa&lt;BR /&gt;domain-name default.domain.invalid&lt;BR /&gt;name xx.xx.xx.102 PCCW_Pri_Webmail&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;name xx.xx.xx.103 PCCW_Sec_Webmail&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;name xx.xx.xx.104 PCCW_Pri_SMTP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;name xx.xx.yy.150 PCCW_Sec_SMTP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;name 172.16.0.16 DMZ_FTP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;name 172.16.0.253 DMZ_IronPort &lt;BR /&gt;name 172.16.0.25 DMZ_MS01&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;name 192.168.10.25 LAN_MS02&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;name 172.16.0.252 DMZ_IronPort_2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;name xx.xx.yy.151 PCCW_FTP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;interface Ethernet0/0&lt;BR /&gt; nameif LAN&lt;BR /&gt; security-level 100&lt;BR /&gt; ip address 192.168.10.254 255.255.255.0 &lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;interface Ethernet0/1&lt;BR /&gt; nameif WAN&lt;BR /&gt; security-level 0&lt;BR /&gt; ip address xx.xx.xx.101 255.255.255.248 &lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;interface Ethernet0/2&lt;BR /&gt; nameif DMZ&lt;BR /&gt; security-level 50&lt;BR /&gt; ip address 172.16.0.254 255.255.255.0 &lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;interface Management0/0&lt;BR /&gt; nameif management&lt;BR /&gt; security-level 100&lt;BR /&gt; ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 &lt;BR /&gt; management-only&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ftp mode passive&lt;BR /&gt;dns domain-lookup LAN&lt;BR /&gt;dns domain-lookup WAN&lt;BR /&gt;dns domain-lookup DMZ&lt;BR /&gt;dns server-group DNS&lt;BR /&gt; name-server 192.168.10.21&lt;BR /&gt; name-server 210.87.253.48&lt;BR /&gt;dns server-group DefaultDNS&lt;BR /&gt; domain-name default.domain.invalid&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip local pool VPNpool 192.168.20.1-192.168.20.10 mask 255.255.255.0&lt;BR /&gt;asdm image disk0:/asdm521.bin&lt;BR /&gt;no asdm history enable&lt;BR /&gt;arp timeout 14400&lt;BR /&gt;global (WAN) 1 interface&lt;BR /&gt;nat (LAN) 0 access-list LAN_nat0_outbound&lt;BR /&gt;nat (LAN) 1 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0&lt;BR /&gt;nat (DMZ) 0 access-list DMZ_nat0_outbound&lt;BR /&gt;nat (DMZ) 1 172.16.0.0 255.255.255.0&lt;BR /&gt;nat (management) 0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0&lt;BR /&gt;static (LAN,WAN) tcp PCCW_Pri_SMTP ftp LAN_MS02 ftp netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (LAN,WAN) tcp PCCW_Pri_SMTP ssh LAN_MS02 ssh netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (LAN,WAN) tcp PCCW_Pri_SMTP 27 LAN_MS02 27 netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (LAN,WAN) tcp PCCW_Pri_SMTP domain LAN_MS02 domain netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (LAN,WAN) udp PCCW_Pri_SMTP domain LAN_MS02 domain netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (LAN,WAN) tcp PCCW_Pri_SMTP www LAN_MS02 www netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (LAN,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_SMTP 2525 LAN_MS02 smtp netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_Webmail https DMZ_MS01 https netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_SMTP ftp DMZ_MS01 ftp netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_SMTP ssh DMZ_MS01 ssh netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_SMTP 27 DMZ_MS01 27 netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_SMTP domain DMZ_MS01 domain netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_SMTP www DMZ_MS01 www netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Pri_SMTP smtp DMZ_IronPort_2 smtp netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_FTP ftp DMZ_FTP ftp netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_SMTP smtp DMZ_MS01 smtp netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (LAN,DMZ) 192.168.10.0 192.168.10.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 &lt;BR /&gt;static (DMZ,LAN) 172.16.0.0 172.16.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 &lt;BR /&gt;static (LAN,WAN) PCCW_Sec_SMTP LAN_MS02 netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;access-group LAN_access_in in interface LAN&lt;BR /&gt;access-group WAN_access_in in interface WAN&lt;BR /&gt;access-group WAN_access_out out interface WAN&lt;BR /&gt;access-group DMZ_access_in in interface DMZ&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;timeout xlate 3:00:00&lt;BR /&gt;timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02&lt;BR /&gt;timeout sunrpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 1:00:00 mgcp 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00&lt;BR /&gt;timeout sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 sip-invite 0:03:00 sip-disconnect 0:02:00&lt;BR /&gt;timeout uauth 0:05:00 absolute&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 01:06:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596790#M587173</guid>
      <dc:creator>egthkaa20060417</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-20T01:06:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Overlapping nat rule problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596791#M587183</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for that, but I couldn't find DMZ_IronPort_1 name under the posted configuration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You were saying that:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Pri_SMTP smtp &lt;STRONG&gt;DMZ_IronPort_1&lt;/STRONG&gt; smtp netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;overlapped another rule static (LAN,WAN) PCCW_Sec_SMTP LAN_MS02 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I convert those 2 static NAT lines to use ip address instead of name, here is what I got:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;also assuming that "DMZ_IronPort_1" is "DMZ_IronPort" based on your posted configuration because i can't find "DMZ_IronPort_1"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp xx.xx.xx.104 smtp 172.16.0.253 smtp netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (LAN,WAN) xx.xx.yy.150 192.168.10.25 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Those 2 static NAT shouldn't overlap as they are referring to different ip address. I would suggest that you configure the static NAT with ip address instead of name as it would be confusing sometimes with names.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 02:45:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596791#M587183</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-20T02:45:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Overlapping nat rule problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596792#M587195</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry for missing the info. Actually, the ip of DMZ_IronPort_1 is 172.16.0.252.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I changed the NAT rule from ADSM instead of Command Line. I still get the same problem. Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:00:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596792#M587195</guid>
      <dc:creator>egthkaa20060417</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-20T03:00:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Overlapping nat rule problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596793#M587202</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, that is the issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently 172.16.0.252 has been assigned to DMZ_IronPort_2 base on your naming configuration:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;name 172.16.0.252 DMZ_IronPort_2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:03:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596793#M587202</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-20T03:03:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Overlapping nat rule problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596794#M587208</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am sorry that. May be there is the typo. Pls replace the DMZ_IronPort_2 with DMZ_Iron_Port_1 Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:08:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596794#M587208</guid>
      <dc:creator>egthkaa20060417</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-20T03:08:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Overlapping nat rule problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596795#M587212</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;DMZ_IronPort_1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:08:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596795#M587212</guid>
      <dc:creator>egthkaa20060417</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-20T03:08:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Overlapping nat rule problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596796#M587218</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ok, it is confusing now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You already have the following configured:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Pri_SMTP smtp DMZ_IronPort_2 smtp netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and I believe this is what you are trying to configure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is already in your configuration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:10:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596796#M587218</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-20T03:10:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Overlapping nat rule problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596797#M587222</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pls ignore the previous 2 msg&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The actual comman should be this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Pri_SMTP smtp &lt;STRONG&gt;DMZ_IronPort&lt;/STRONG&gt; smtp netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;overlapped another rule static (LAN,WAN) PCCW_Sec_SMTP LAN_MS02 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After I entered it, I got the overlapping error. Thanks and sorry for making you confused.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:11:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596797#M587222</guid>
      <dc:creator>egthkaa20060417</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-20T03:11:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Overlapping nat rule problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596798#M587226</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since there is the typo&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let me claify it&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The original rule is&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_SMTP smtp DMZ_MS01 smtp netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (LAN,WAN) PCCW_Sec_SMTP LAN_MS02 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and I would like to change it to&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_SMTP smtp &lt;STRONG&gt;DMZ_IronPort&lt;/STRONG&gt; smtp netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And I got the overlapping error. Sorry for the confusing. Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:24:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596798#M587226</guid>
      <dc:creator>egthkaa20060417</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-20T03:24:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Overlapping nat rule problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596799#M587227</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV class="jive-thread-reply-message"&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:f9e841e2-9a4d-4403-8a8e-210faa11b1bb] --&gt;&lt;DIV class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since there is the typo&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let me claify it&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The original rule is&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_SMTP smtp DMZ_MS01 smtp netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (LAN,WAN) PCCW_Sec_SMTP LAN_MS02 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and I would like to change it to&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_SMTP smtp &lt;STRONG&gt;DMZ_IronPort&lt;/STRONG&gt; smtp netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And I got the overlapping error. Sorry for the confusing. Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 06:28:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596799#M587227</guid>
      <dc:creator>egthkaa20060417</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-20T06:28:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Overlapping nat rule problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596800#M587231</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Steven,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This error is expected because the ASA cannot translate the same public IP and port to different internal hosts. Think about it this way:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote"&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_SMTP smtp DMZ_IronPort smtp netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_SMTP smtp DMZ_MS01 smtp netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If a packet enters the WAN interface destined to PCCW_Sec_SMTP on TCP port 25, what should the destination address be translated to? Those rules are saying it should be translated to *both* DMZ_IronPort and DMZ_MS01, which is not possible. It can only be translated to 1 internal host.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As an alternative, you would need to use a different public IP address or change one of the mapped ports, such as:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote"&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_SMTP smtp DMZ_IronPort smtp netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp ALT_PCCW_SMTP smtp DMZ_MS01 smtp netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;or&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote"&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_SMTP smtp DMZ_IronPort smtp netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_SMTP 2525 DMZ_MS01 smtp netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Mike&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 13:58:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596800#M587231</guid>
      <dc:creator>mirober2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-20T13:58:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Overlapping nat rule problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596801#M587232</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Mike,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Originally, the existing rule is this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_SMTP smtp DMZ_MS01 smtp netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (LAN,WAN) PCCW_Sec_SMTP LAN_MS02 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and I want to change it to&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_SMTP smtp &lt;STRONG&gt;DMZ_IronPort&lt;/STRONG&gt; smtp netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (LAN,WAN) PCCW_Sec_SMTP LAN_MS02 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and I got the overlapping error with the rule: "static (LAN,WAN) PCCW_Sec_SMTP LAN_MS02 netmask 255.255.255.255"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that it can clarify my problem. Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:50:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596801#M587232</guid>
      <dc:creator>egthkaa20060417</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-21T00:50:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Overlapping nat rule problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596802#M587233</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Steven,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You are using overlapping public ip address. You can't use the same ip address to configure static 1:1. You can configure static port address redirection on different ports using the same public ip address.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So currently the following 2 static NAT will overlap:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp &lt;SPAN style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;PCCW_Sec_SMTP&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; smtp &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DMZ_IronPort&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; smtp netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;static (LAN,WAN) &lt;STRONG style="color: #ff0000; "&gt;PCCW_Sec_SMTP&lt;/STRONG&gt; LAN_MS02 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So the 2nd line is 1:1 static NAT and you can't reuse the same public ip address after you configure the static 1:1 NAT.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, if you change the 2nd line to be static port address redirection on other ports than smtp, then it will work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (LAN,WAN) &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #0000ff;"&gt;tcp &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;PCCW_Sec_SMTP&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;STRONG style="color: #0000ff; "&gt;3000 &lt;/STRONG&gt;LAN_MS02 &lt;STRONG style="color: #0000ff; "&gt;3000&lt;/STRONG&gt; netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(port 3000 is just an example, and you would need to change it to the port that you like access on for LAN_MS02 server accordingly).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:12:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596802#M587233</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-21T08:12:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Overlapping nat rule problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596803#M587234</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Jennifer,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then why the other rules e.g static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_SMTP ftp DMZ_MS01 ftp netmask 255.255.255.255 &lt;BR /&gt;will not cause the overlapping problem? Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:38:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596803#M587234</guid>
      <dc:creator>egthkaa20060417</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-21T08:38:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Overlapping nat rule problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596804#M587235</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Because it is static PAT, not static 1:1 NAT.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Difference is you are statically NATing 1 ip address to another ip address for static 1:1 NAT (and this means it includes all ports), while static PAT, you are NATing the ip address only base on 1 port.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reason why it doesn't overlap with this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (DMZ,WAN) tcp PCCW_Sec_SMTP ftp DMZ_MS01 ftp netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is because the port is different. The above line is on port 21 (ftp), and the other one is on port 25 (smtp).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:48:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/overlapping-nat-rule-problem/m-p/1596804#M587235</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-21T08:48:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

