<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX content filter in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-content-filter/m-p/193512#M590297</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;i think you should test your software with the configuration on the pix with "no fixup protocol http 80"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2003 09:30:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tcavdar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-08-28T09:30:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX content filter</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-content-filter/m-p/193511#M590296</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Forum,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;our software is tunneling data (rpc-calls etc.) using http to go through firewalls on port 80.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One of our customers has a pix. The pix is removing the content from our http-requests.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We found that out, using a packet sniffer. We checked the packet befor it entered the pix&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and checked how it came out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We don't have access to configure this pix, that's done by another comany.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am thingking about getting another customer a pix, but I want to make sure, that the pix is not messing up our traffic. Is it possible to disable this functionality?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Christian&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:57:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-content-filter/m-p/193511#M590296</guid>
      <dc:creator>kiksen1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:57:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX content filter</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-content-filter/m-p/193512#M590297</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;i think you should test your software with the configuration on the pix with "no fixup protocol http 80"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2003 09:30:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-content-filter/m-p/193512#M590297</guid>
      <dc:creator>tcavdar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-08-28T09:30:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX content filter</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-content-filter/m-p/193513#M590298</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you! this should help:)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;best&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;christian&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 06:06:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-content-filter/m-p/193513#M590298</guid>
      <dc:creator>kiksen1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-08-29T06:06:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

