<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: no forward interface on 5510 in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-forward-interface-on-5510/m-p/1617191#M594312</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply. That sums it up very well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:50:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lcaruso</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-01-13T22:50:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>no forward interface on 5510</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-forward-interface-on-5510/m-p/1617188#M594309</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There doesn't seem to be a no forward interface command on the 5510 as it is used on the 5505 (no vlans being used on 5510).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there another command to stop traffic from getting from one interface to another without an access list?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are doing some testing of a different provider and do not want any possible unintended routing paths taken--just want to verify the mac address of the problem Charter modem is seen.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 19:34:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-forward-interface-on-5510/m-p/1617188#M594309</guid>
      <dc:creator>lcaruso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T19:34:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: no forward interface on 5510</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-forward-interface-on-5510/m-p/1617189#M594310</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you configure both interfaces in the same security level, and ensure that "same-security-traffic permit inter-interface" command is not configured on the firewall, then there will not be any communication between those two interfaces. If you have configured&amp;nbsp; "same-security-traffic permit inter-interface" for some other purpose, then make sure that you have not configured any NAT rules between the two interfaces in question (NAT control is enabled).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface ethernet 0/0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nameif inside1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;security-level 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;exit&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface ethernet 0/1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nameif inside2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;security-level 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip&amp;nbsp; address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;exit&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no same-security-traffic permit inter-interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat-control&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nagaraja&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:43:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-forward-interface-on-5510/m-p/1617189#M594310</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nagaraja Thanthry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-13T22:43:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: no forward interface on 5510</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-forward-interface-on-5510/m-p/1617190#M594311</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe "management-only" interface command will suit your needs?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa82/command/reference/m.html#wp2028112"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa82/command/reference/m.html#wp2028112&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marcin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:45:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-forward-interface-on-5510/m-p/1617190#M594311</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marcin Latosiewicz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-13T22:45:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: no forward interface on 5510</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-forward-interface-on-5510/m-p/1617191#M594312</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply. That sums it up very well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:50:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-forward-interface-on-5510/m-p/1617191#M594312</guid>
      <dc:creator>lcaruso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-13T22:50:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: no forward interface on 5510</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-forward-interface-on-5510/m-p/1617192#M594313</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply. Easy and perfect. Why didn't I think of that?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:51:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-forward-interface-on-5510/m-p/1617192#M594313</guid>
      <dc:creator>lcaruso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-13T22:51:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

