<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Passing Multicast through a Pix in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/passing-multicast-through-a-pix/m-p/1632774#M595058</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have quite a simple set up. But for the life of me I cannot see why a rule keeps blocking my multicast traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(Addressing is made up)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In essence I have one server that has a unicast address of 172.30.1.1/24 and it is multi-casting out on 234.1.1.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the rule says : -&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;permit udp 172.30.1.1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 234.1.1.1 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The more I look at the rule, the more it looks wrong, but I don't know why - if that makes any sense ..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a special way to write a rule to allow multicast traffic through ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bets Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mike&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 19:31:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>thstagman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T19:31:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Passing Multicast through a Pix</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/passing-multicast-through-a-pix/m-p/1632774#M595058</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have quite a simple set up. But for the life of me I cannot see why a rule keeps blocking my multicast traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(Addressing is made up)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In essence I have one server that has a unicast address of 172.30.1.1/24 and it is multi-casting out on 234.1.1.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the rule says : -&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;permit udp 172.30.1.1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 234.1.1.1 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The more I look at the rule, the more it looks wrong, but I don't know why - if that makes any sense ..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a special way to write a rule to allow multicast traffic through ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bets Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mike&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 19:31:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/passing-multicast-through-a-pix/m-p/1632774#M595058</guid>
      <dc:creator>thstagman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T19:31:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Passing Multicast through a Pix</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/passing-multicast-through-a-pix/m-p/1632775#M595060</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;PIX in routed mode does not support multicast passthrough. Only in transparent mode, multicast passthrough is supported.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that answers your question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 02:58:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/passing-multicast-through-a-pix/m-p/1632775#M595060</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-07T02:58:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Passing Multicast through a Pix</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/passing-multicast-through-a-pix/m-p/1632776#M595064</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Jennifer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you run a Pix in&amp;nbsp; both Transparent and Routed mode ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have other "normal" routed sessions going on through the firewall and through the same interface as it happens.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mike&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 10:03:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/passing-multicast-through-a-pix/m-p/1632776#M595064</guid>
      <dc:creator>thstagman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-07T10:03:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Passing Multicast through a Pix</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/passing-multicast-through-a-pix/m-p/1632777#M595066</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, unfortunately you can't run the PIX in transparent and routed mode at the same time. You can only run one at the time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 11:51:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/passing-multicast-through-a-pix/m-p/1632777#M595066</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-07T11:51:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

