<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ASA/ASDM question in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-asdm-question/m-p/1545652#M597256</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I've got an ASA 5540 (will post revision when I'm in a position to connect) that I often connect to through ASDM (will post revision).&amp;nbsp; Back in June I pulled down the running-config through the GUI option to "show running config in new window", copied the config, and saved it to a .txt file.&amp;nbsp; In the last couple days I followed the same procedure.&amp;nbsp; This is all part of semi-annual reviews.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While the information between the two appears to be the same and accurate, I came across a curious issue.&amp;nbsp; In the June copy of the running-config my interface ACLs call the source and destination objects by their configured object names.&amp;nbsp; In the December copy the running-config ACLs call the src/dst by their IPs, rather than object names.&amp;nbsp; I've not actively upgraded the ASA since June.&amp;nbsp; I have upgraded the IPS module.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this a concern?&amp;nbsp; Does anyone know why this would happen?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 19:20:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>adam.zinser</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T19:20:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA/ASDM question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-asdm-question/m-p/1545652#M597256</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've got an ASA 5540 (will post revision when I'm in a position to connect) that I often connect to through ASDM (will post revision).&amp;nbsp; Back in June I pulled down the running-config through the GUI option to "show running config in new window", copied the config, and saved it to a .txt file.&amp;nbsp; In the last couple days I followed the same procedure.&amp;nbsp; This is all part of semi-annual reviews.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While the information between the two appears to be the same and accurate, I came across a curious issue.&amp;nbsp; In the June copy of the running-config my interface ACLs call the source and destination objects by their configured object names.&amp;nbsp; In the December copy the running-config ACLs call the src/dst by their IPs, rather than object names.&amp;nbsp; I've not actively upgraded the ASA since June.&amp;nbsp; I have upgraded the IPS module.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this a concern?&amp;nbsp; Does anyone know why this would happen?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 19:20:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-asdm-question/m-p/1545652#M597256</guid>
      <dc:creator>adam.zinser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T19:20:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA/ASDM question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-asdm-question/m-p/1545653#M597257</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Adam,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't know if its your case but there's a command ''names'' that will show the running-config with all the names (instead of IPs).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you issue ''no names'' nothing changes besides showing the configuration with the IPs (instead than the names).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Federico.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 20:32:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-asdm-question/m-p/1545653#M597257</guid>
      <dc:creator>Federico Coto Fajardo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-10T20:32:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA/ASDM question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-asdm-question/m-p/1545654#M597258</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does "names" or "no names" show up in the running-config?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 20:34:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-asdm-question/m-p/1545654#M597258</guid>
      <dc:creator>adam.zinser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-10T20:34:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA/ASDM question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-asdm-question/m-p/1545655#M597259</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And you can also see it (if you're logged in via CLI) doing ''sh run | i names''&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Federico.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 20:36:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-asdm-question/m-p/1545655#M597259</guid>
      <dc:creator>Federico Coto Fajardo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-10T20:36:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA/ASDM question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-asdm-question/m-p/1545656#M597260</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks much!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 20:55:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-asdm-question/m-p/1545656#M597260</guid>
      <dc:creator>adam.zinser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-10T20:55:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

