<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VPN Users cannot reach DMZ in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-users-cannot-reach-dmz/m-p/1556298#M601314</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the help guys, but I figured it out myself.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will post my running config tomorrow if you're interested in the solution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bert&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:30:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bert Kelchtermans</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-10-11T14:30:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VPN Users cannot reach DMZ</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-users-cannot-reach-dmz/m-p/1556294#M601310</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a ASA 5510 that has a couple of site to site vpn connections, they work&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fine, the only problem is that they cannot reach the webserver in the dmz&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VPN subnets 192.0.2.0 255.255.255.0, 192.0.4.0 255.255.255.0, 192.0.6.0 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DMZ 172.16.0.0 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Webserver DMZ 172.16.0.5 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The users in the inside network and from the internet have no problems connecting.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have attached the running config.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:52:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-users-cannot-reach-dmz/m-p/1556294#M601310</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bert Kelchtermans</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T18:52:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN Users cannot reach DMZ</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-users-cannot-reach-dmz/m-p/1556295#M601311</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bert,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you also attach "show crypto ipsec sa" when tunnels are connected and initiating traffic to webserver.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NAT and permissions look OK of course, I would like to see if the IPsec SAs come up when you initiate traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When you do the test&amp;nbsp; can you also do "show logg | i 172.16.0.5" ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe we should also look on other sites' configs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marcin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:14:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-users-cannot-reach-dmz/m-p/1556295#M601311</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marcin Latosiewicz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-11T12:14:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN Users cannot reach DMZ</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-users-cannot-reach-dmz/m-p/1556296#M601312</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Bert,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I checked the config and here is my observation: On the dmz interface you have the following access-list applied:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list dmz_access_in extended permit tcp any host 172.16.0.5 eq www&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-group dmz_access_in in interface dmz&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i.e, on the inbound direction of the dmz interface, you are allowing any packet distined to host 172.16.0.5, but with this you are not allowing reply packets from the webserver (172.16.0.5) itself to outside machines.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think the access-list on the dmz should look like this: (wherein we are allowing the webserver to reply to any request packets)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list dmz_access_in extended permit tcp&amp;nbsp; host 172.16.0.5 eq www &lt;STRONG&gt;any&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-group dmz_access_in in interface dmz&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I surprised that the inside users are able to connect to this webserver in the dmz as you have said, since with the existing access-list, it would not allow this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let me know if this helps,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rudresh V&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:08:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-users-cannot-reach-dmz/m-p/1556296#M601312</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rudresh Veerappaji</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-11T14:08:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN Users cannot reach DMZ</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-users-cannot-reach-dmz/m-p/1556297#M601313</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rudresh,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Traffic subject to VPN is byspassing ACLs unless you turn of the sysopt explictly. ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;dmz_access_in, will never be checked for traffic coming in from any other interfaces. Only traffic initiated from DMZ interface would be affected by this ACL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marcin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:22:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-users-cannot-reach-dmz/m-p/1556297#M601313</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marcin Latosiewicz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-11T14:22:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN Users cannot reach DMZ</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-users-cannot-reach-dmz/m-p/1556298#M601314</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the help guys, but I figured it out myself.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will post my running config tomorrow if you're interested in the solution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bert&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:30:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-users-cannot-reach-dmz/m-p/1556298#M601314</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bert Kelchtermans</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-11T14:30:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN Users cannot reach DMZ</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-users-cannot-reach-dmz/m-p/1556299#M601315</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bert,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For future reference it's better to have solutions indeed, might help someone save some time in future &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marcin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:36:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-users-cannot-reach-dmz/m-p/1556299#M601315</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marcin Latosiewicz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-11T14:36:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN Users cannot reach DMZ</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-users-cannot-reach-dmz/m-p/1556300#M601316</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote"&gt;&lt;P&gt;rudv wrote:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Bert,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I surprised that the inside users are able to connect to this webserver in the dmz as you have said, since with the existing access-list, it would not allow this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rudresh V&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rudresh ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the traffic is by default allowed from the interfaces with a higher security-level ( inside 100 ) to a lower security level ( dmz 10 or outside 0 ) .By default meaning that there is no need of an access-list&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:34:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-users-cannot-reach-dmz/m-p/1556300#M601316</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dan-Ciprian Cicioiu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-11T15:34:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

