<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: pix inside+dmz problem in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-inside-dmz-problem/m-p/157118#M605946</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Minul.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the problem to configure access from the whole dmz to (a subnet in) the inside and viceversa. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For dmz to inside connection, I understand from your reply that I need :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside, dmz) 10.1.1.0 10.1.1.0 + access-list 102. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But what about inside to dmz connections? Do you mean that I need a simple&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 0 access-list in-to-dmz &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or that I need nothing else at all?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Michele &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2003 07:15:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>m.laporta</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-05-15T07:15:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>pix inside+dmz problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-inside-dmz-problem/m-p/157116#M605944</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a cisco 520 pix firewall and have the inside, outside and dmz working well. The INSIDE was addded recently and now, I want  the inside and dmz zones to communicate with each other. IS this possible. If then how?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;can anyone help me out with some links or their own solutions?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ramesh&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:44:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-inside-dmz-problem/m-p/157116#M605944</guid>
      <dc:creator>ramesh.krishnan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:44:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pix inside+dmz problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-inside-dmz-problem/m-p/157117#M605945</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ramesh,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, this will definitely work.  For simplicity purpose lets have an example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Inside : 10.1.1.0/24 network                            inside interface of pix: 10.1.1.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;dmz: 172.16.171.0/24 network                        dmz interface of pix: 172.16.171.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For connection from inside to dmz: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 1 10.1.1.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (dmz) 1 interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have acl appalied on inside interface, pl. make sure to allow the traffic from iunside to dmz.  Also, if you have an existing nat for the outside, then you may apply the same nat to the dmz interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For connection from dmz to inside:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside, dmz) 10.1.1.50 10.1.1.50    (lets say web server has ip 10.1.1.50)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 102 permit tcp any host 10.1.1.50 permit 80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-group dmz in&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note: if you want to allow the communication from dmz to inside, the whole network then you can define " static (inside, dmz) 10.1.1.0 10.1.1.0), in that case, you will not need the nat/global for the inside to outside communication.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope this helps !  Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mynul  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2003 18:51:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-inside-dmz-problem/m-p/157117#M605945</guid>
      <dc:creator>mhoda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-05-14T18:51:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pix inside+dmz problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-inside-dmz-problem/m-p/157118#M605946</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Minul.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the problem to configure access from the whole dmz to (a subnet in) the inside and viceversa. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For dmz to inside connection, I understand from your reply that I need :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside, dmz) 10.1.1.0 10.1.1.0 + access-list 102. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But what about inside to dmz connections? Do you mean that I need a simple&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 0 access-list in-to-dmz &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or that I need nothing else at all?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Michele &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2003 07:15:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-inside-dmz-problem/m-p/157118#M605946</guid>
      <dc:creator>m.laporta</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-05-15T07:15:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pix inside+dmz problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-inside-dmz-problem/m-p/157119#M605947</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Michele,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Once you define static, you will not need anyting else.  If you define nat (inside) 0 ACL then, this will superce static and will perform the same job.  So, either of this two options will work for you.  So, define either static or nat 0 ACL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope its clear !  Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mynul  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2003 20:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-inside-dmz-problem/m-p/157119#M605947</guid>
      <dc:creator>mhoda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-05-15T20:43:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pix inside+dmz problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-inside-dmz-problem/m-p/157120#M605948</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi Mynul,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The same worked. thanks a lot...thanks a 100 times..... &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ramesh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2003 11:40:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-inside-dmz-problem/m-p/157120#M605948</guid>
      <dc:creator>ramesh.krishnan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-05-18T11:40:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

