<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PIX Failover in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover/m-p/132733#M607426</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We are adding a second PIX 515 with a FO license as a failover device.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am concerned about what will happen in the event of a failover.  Specifically, the documentation says to not use a FO device as a standalone because it will automatically reboot once every 24 hours.  What will happen if I am out of town for 1 week, and the power supply of the primary device dies.  Will the secondary device be rebooting every 24 hours because it thinks it is now being used as a stand-alone device?   The primary device is "gone" now, after all.  Or, will the FO device run for an indefinite period of time without rebooting?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:40:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sdarwin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:40:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX Failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover/m-p/132733#M607426</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are adding a second PIX 515 with a FO license as a failover device.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am concerned about what will happen in the event of a failover.  Specifically, the documentation says to not use a FO device as a standalone because it will automatically reboot once every 24 hours.  What will happen if I am out of town for 1 week, and the power supply of the primary device dies.  Will the secondary device be rebooting every 24 hours because it thinks it is now being used as a stand-alone device?   The primary device is "gone" now, after all.  Or, will the FO device run for an indefinite period of time without rebooting?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:40:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover/m-p/132733#M607426</guid>
      <dc:creator>sdarwin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:40:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX Failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover/m-p/132734#M607427</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;As long as the failover cable stays connected, the FO unit detects this and knows that there is still a primary unit, even if it is powered down (the cable has a short in it somehow that detects that it's connected to a unit even if that unit has no power).  In this situation, it won't reboot every 24 hours and you'll be fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The theory is that you get a replacement for the failed primary, but leave it cabled up while you're doing this so that the secondary knows there's still a PIX there.  Then you can replace the failed unit at your leisure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can read all about failover here: &lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_sw/v_63/cmdref/df.htm#1067379" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_sw/v_63/cmdref/df.htm#1067379&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2003 05:18:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover/m-p/132734#M607427</guid>
      <dc:creator>gfullage</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-04-04T05:18:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX Failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover/m-p/132735#M607428</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What about if you use an ethernet connection (crossover cable) for failover instead of the failover cable. Is this still the case?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2003 13:21:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-failover/m-p/132735#M607428</guid>
      <dc:creator>karl.jones</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-04-04T13:21:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

